[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-09-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

Chen Lei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2010-09-06 06:31:59

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-09-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  2010-09-05 13:52:46 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-09-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

Chen Lei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #7 from Chen Lei  2010-09-04 22:03:23 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: python-Enable
Short Description: Drawing and interaction packages
Owners: supercyper
Branches: F-13 F-14
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-09-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

Liang Suilong  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-09-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #6 from Liang Suilong  2010-09-03 04:41:10 
EDT ---
I don't see any issue about this package, approved!

Thank you for your great work, Manuel Wolfshant.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-09-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

Liang Suilong  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||liangsuil...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|liangsuil...@gmail.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

manuel wolfshant  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
 AssignedTo|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro|nob...@fedoraproject.org
   Flag|fedora-review?  |

--- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant  2010-08-20 
06:52:31 EDT ---
I am sorry, but due to lack of time I have to abandon this review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #4 from Chen Lei  2010-08-03 08:42:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > The license for this package is complicated, see image_LICENSE.txt, BSD and
> > LGPLv3 and Public Domain is not enough(e.g. images from cristalproject is
> > licensed under LGPLv2+).
> I've seen that. But AFAIK, LGPLv2+ + LGPLv3 kind of equals LGPLv3. But by all
> means please correct me if I am wrong
If LGPLv2+ and LGPLv3 source files are compiled into one binary, then the
license for this binary should be LGPLv3. If those files are not compiled into
one file, then they are still licensed under their original license. 

> > Doing tests in %check will pull in a lot of other ETS packages, normally I'd
> > like to do it on a local machine which is already installed the whole ETS
> > stacks. For no core python packages, I think doing tests is not a good idea,
> > because most Requires are not listed in BuildRequires.
> But you can add them as BR, as needed. AFAIK running the embedded tests is
> encouraged for all software ( unless it is prohibitive or cannot be done in
> koji)

Right, it'll be better to do %check in spec if it's convenient to do so. This
package will pull in >200M addtional deps for tests, I don't think it's really
worth to do so.  For C/C++ packages, doing tests normally won't pull in many
additional buildrequires. However, for some python packages, I think doing
tests is impossible under some circumstance(e.g. Zope2 requires donzes of tiny
python modules, all those modules depends on a large amount of other modules,
obviously we can't do tests for all those modules).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant  2010-08-03 
08:17:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The license for this package is complicated, see image_LICENSE.txt, BSD and
> LGPLv3 and Public Domain is not enough(e.g. images from cristalproject is
> licensed under LGPLv2+).
I've seen that. But AFAIK, LGPLv2+ + LGPLv3 kind of equals LGPLv3. But by all
means please correct me if I am wrong


> 
> Doing tests in %check will pull in a lot of other ETS packages, normally I'd
> like to do it on a local machine which is already installed the whole ETS
> stacks. For no core python packages, I think doing tests is not a good idea,
> because most Requires are not listed in BuildRequires.
But you can add them as BR, as needed. AFAIK running the embedded tests is
encouraged for all software ( unless it is prohibitive or cannot be done in
koji)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #2 from Chen Lei  2010-08-03 08:01:09 EDT ---
The license for this package is complicated, see image_LICENSE.txt, BSD and
LGPLv3 and Public Domain is not enough(e.g. images from cristalproject is
licensed under LGPLv2+).

Doing tests in %check will pull in a lot of other ETS packages, normally I'd
like to do it on a local machine which is already installed the whole ETS
stacks. For no core python packages, I think doing tests is not a good idea,
because most Requires are not listed in BuildRequires.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant  2010-08-03 
07:01:51 EDT ---
Before going into deeper analysis, I think that the license tag should probably
be more similar to "BSD and LGPLv3 and Public Domain". Also, have you
considered including the tests ( "integrationtests") ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

manuel wolfshant  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 620039] Review Request: python-Enable - Drawing and interaction packages

2010-08-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039

Chen Lei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||620166

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review