[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #17 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-04 09:11:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) 1) If I look into https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries and considered /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-lib.spec as a reference for library packaging specfile then I don't see following Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig 2) Following is no longer mandatory by review guidelines since long time Requires: pkgconfig So you can remove this safely. Reference see this guidelines update diff https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3AGuidelinesdiff=145230oldid=144537 Parag, please can you remove them from zif in fedora git master. You know what you are doing :-) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo? | Last Closed||2010-10-04 04:50:42 --- Comment #15 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-04 04:50:42 EDT --- Thanks guys, appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #16 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-10-04 05:09:01 EDT --- 1) If I look into https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries and considered /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-lib.spec as a reference for library packaging specfile then I don't see following Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig 2) Following is no longer mandatory by review guidelines since long time Requires: pkgconfig So you can remove this safely. Reference see this guidelines update diff https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3AGuidelinesdiff=145230oldid=144537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-10-05 00:26:43 EDT --- Thanks. I have committed required changes and built new package in F15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-10-03 16:31:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mschm...@redhat.com QAContact|mschm...@redhat.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mschm...@redhat.com QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |mschm...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763
Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rra...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus rra...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 08:29:20 EDT ---
My bits:
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/zif-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
zif.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
I guess you should specify package group. System Environment/Libraries can be
correct.
zif.src:53: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
zif.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
zif.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
zif.src: W: no-%clean-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
it is ok
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/zif-*
zif.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
zif.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libzif.so.1.0.1
e...@glibc_2.2.5
This is not good. Should be fixed upstream (but I don't examine it deeply)
zif.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/zif.1.gz 1: warning:
`\' not defined
I don't know...
zif-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GLib - G Lib, Glib, Lib
zif-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GLib - G Lib, Glib,
Lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
ok
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763
--- Comment #2 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 08:53:02
EDT ---
%define alphatag.20100908git
This macro is not used anywhere. Also, %global is preferred to %define these
days.
%package devel
[...]
Requires: sqlite-devel
%{?_isa} would be nice here.
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies
%package devel
[...]
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
[...]
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING
[...]
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING
No need to duplicate these files here, because -devel Requires the main
package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763
--- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 09:02:41
EDT ---
The files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/zif/ look like developer's documentation
to me. Wouldn't they be better placed in the -devel package?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #4 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 09:28:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) My bits: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/zif-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm zif.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified I guess you should specify package group. System Environment/Libraries can be correct. Nahh, this is only for F14+, so the group isn't required at all. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/zif-* zif.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified zif.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libzif.so.1.0.1 e...@glibc_2.2.5 This is not good. Should be fixed upstream (but I don't examine it deeply) Although there is a call to exit(), it's in egg_error() which is a shared egg file between a number of projects. egg_error() is never called in zif, and certainly not exported, and so it's impossible to call exit. zif.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/zif.1.gz 1: warning: `\' not defined I don't know... Not sure, I think it's a rpmlint buglet. All my packages seem to have this warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763
--- Comment #5 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 09:39:54 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
%define alphatag.20100908git
This macro is not used anywhere. Also, %global is preferred to %define these
days.
Eeek, sorry, that got left in from my initial package that was based on the git
checkout. Removed now.
%package devel
[...]
Requires: sqlite-devel
%{?_isa} would be nice here.
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies
Fixed.
%package devel
[...]
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
[...]
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING
[...]
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING
No need to duplicate these files here, because -devel Requires the main
package.
Fixed, thanks.
(In reply to comment #3)
The files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/zif/ look like developer's documentation
to me. Wouldn't they be better placed in the -devel package?
Yup, oops, thanks. New spec and SRPMS for review:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif.spec
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif-0.1.0-2.fc14.src.rpm
Richard.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #6 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 09:52:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) zif.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/zif.1.gz 1: warning: `\' not defined I don't know... Not sure, I think it's a rpmlint buglet. All my packages seem to have this warning. rpmlint merely cites a warning detected by running: cat man/zif.1 |gtbl |groff -mtty-char -Tutf8 -P-c -mandoc -mandoc -wmac /dev/null It does not like the first line: .\\ auto-generated by docbook2man-spec $Revision$ I believe the correct comment format would be: .\ auto-generated ... But that's a bug in docbook2man then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #7 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 10:10:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) But that's a bug in docbook2man then. ... filed as bug 639347. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #8 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 11:00:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #1) I guess you should specify package group. System Environment/Libraries can be correct. Nahh, this is only for F14+, so the group isn't required at all. Right, rpm considers the Group tag optional since version 4.6. Though I could swear Fedora Packaging Guidelines still asked for the tag to be specified, I cannot find the requirement anywhere now. Perhaps it's been removed already. But please be consistent. The -devel subpackage does have a Group tag. I suggest you extend the %description for the main package a bit. Right now it only repeats what the Summary says and it is not very informative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #9 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 11:26:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Right, rpm considers the Group tag optional since version 4.6. Though I could swear Fedora Packaging Guidelines still asked for the tag to be specified, I cannot find the requirement anywhere now. Perhaps it's been removed already. I think so. But please be consistent. The -devel subpackage does have a Group tag. Agreed, apologies. I suggest you extend the %description for the main package a bit. Right now it only repeats what the Summary says and it is not very informative. Gotcha. I've added something better. New spec and SRPMS for review: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif-0.1.0-3.fc14.src.rpm Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763
--- Comment #10 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 13:20:15
EDT ---
$ rpmlint {SRPMS,RPMS/x86_64}/zif*-3.*rpm
zif.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
zif.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
zif.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
zif.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
zif.src: W: no-%clean-section
zif.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
All OK with current rpm.
zif.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libzif.so.1.0.1
e...@glibc_2.2.5
OK. exit() is called only from egg_error_real() which is never used in the
library.
BTW, a clever use of unsafe linker options might even elimitate the function.
zif.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/zif.1.gz 1: warning:
macro `\' not defined
zif-devel.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
Can be ignored.
Formal review
-
[OK] ... guideline matched
[--] ... irrelevant guideline
[??] ... needs discussion
[!!] ... needs fixing
-
[OK] rpmlint posted
[OK] Naming Guidelines
[OK] spec file name matches package name
[..] Packaging Guidelines:
[OK] naming
[OK] version and release
[OK] legal
[OK] no pre-built binaries
[OK] spec legibility
[OK] architecture support
[OK] fs layout
[OK] rpmlint
[OK] changelog
[OK] tags
[OK] BuildRoot tag (not needed)
[OK] %clean (not needed)
[??] Requires
I wonder what is special about sqlite-devel that it is required
explicitly by zif-devel, but libarchive-devel is left to be pulled
automatically via rpm's pkgconfig dependency extraction.
[OK] BuildRequires
[OK] Summary and description
[OK] encoding
[OK] documentation
[OK] compiler flags
[OK] debuginfo
[OK] devel package
[OK] requiring base package
[OK] shared libraries
[--] static libraries
[OK] no duplication of system libraries
[OK] no rpaths
[--] config files
[--] initscripts
[--] desktop files
[!!] macros
%{_mandir} should be used instead of %{_datadir}/man/
[--] %global preferred over %define
[--] handling of locale files
[OK] timestamps
[OK] parallel make
[OK] scriptlets
[--] conditional deps
[OK] not relocatable
[OK] code vs content
[!!] file and dir ownership
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html is owned neither by zif-devel nor any
Required package. Should Require gtk-doc?
[OK] no duplicate files
[OK] file permissions
[--] users and groups
[--] web apps
[OK] no conflicts
[OK] no kernel modules
[OK] nothing under /srv
[OK] no bundling
[--] patches should have upstream bug link or comment
[--] use of epochs
[OK] symlinks
[OK] man pages
[--] application-specific guidelines
[OK] approved license
[OK] GPLv2+ is correct
[OK] COPYING included in %doc
[OK] American English
[OK] legible spec
[OK] source matches upstream, sha256sum:
aefac3cce4310e942bf735ea259efc45ba32fbe1c7cb6461e7f74637fd5df2d5
[OK] builds successfully
[--] ExcludeArch
[OK] BuildRequires
[--] locales
[OK] ldconfig called
[OK] no bundling
[OK] not relocatable
[!!] owning of directories, already noted above
[OK] no listing files more than once
[OK] permissions, %defattr usage
[OK] consistent macro usage
[OK] code or permissible content
[--] large docs
[OK] docs not necessary for runtime
[OK] headers in -devel
[--] static libs in -static
[OK] *.so in -devel
[OK] -devel requires base with a fully versioned dep
[OK] no *.la archives
[--] *.desktop for GUI apps
[OK] no owning of directories already owned by other packages
[OK] valid UTF-8 filenames
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763
--- Comment #11 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 13:43:44
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
[??] Requires
I wonder what is special about sqlite-devel that it is required
explicitly by zif-devel, but libarchive-devel is left to be pulled
automatically via rpm's pkgconfig dependency extraction.
You're correct. sqlite-devel gets pulled in automatically. I've removed that
line.
[!!] macros
%{_mandir} should be used instead of %{_datadir}/man/
Fixed.
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html is owned neither by zif-devel nor any
Required package. Should Require gtk-doc?
I wasn't sure. Looking into it, I shouldn't just add a Req for gtk-doc, as
there's been a big push to not pull it in unless it's really required. I've
just taken ownership of all the gtk-doc directory, like has been done to my
other packages by other people.
[!!] owning of directories, already noted above
Fixed.
New spec and SRPMS for review:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif.spec
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif-0.1.0-4.fc14.src.rpm
Thanks,
Richard.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 14:41:22 EDT --- Everything is good now. Current scratch build in dist-f15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506735 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631763] Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #13 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2010-10-01 14:44:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: zif Short Description: Simple wrapper for rpm Owners: rhughes Branches: f14 InitialCC: rhughes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
