[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #12 from Chen Lei 2010-10-19 12:06:20 EDT --- I'll update libmeegotouch to 0.20.4x soon which is target for Meego 1.2. Since Meego haven't released Tablet UX yet, we still have a lot of time to package MTF stack packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | Keywords||Reopened -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-10-06 23:45:15 --- Comment #11 from Chen Lei 2010-10-06 23:45:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > >rpmlint libmeegotouch-0.20.25-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm > > libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit > /usr/lib64/libmeegotouchcore.so.0.20.24 e...@glibc_2.2.5 > Not OK, please comment/fix. > This won't be a serious issue, I think it's safe to ignore this warning. Many core libraries use exit() function actually. > > libmeegotouch.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/meegotouch 01777L > Not OK, is it really needed to pre-create cache dir with these permissions? > 1777 is better than 777, this directory should be written by normal users. > > Summary - not OK (need comment/fix). How to fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-10-05 04:57:53 EDT --- >rpmlint libmeegotouch-0.20.25-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmeegotouchcore.so.0.20.24 e...@glibc_2.2.5 Not OK, please comment/fix. libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/libmeegotouch.sh libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/meegotouch.schemas OK libmeegotouch.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/meegotouch 01777L Not OK, is it really needed to pre-create cache dir with these permissions? libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mthemedaemon libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mservicemapper OK libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm libmeegotouch.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm OK, probably comes from %gconf_schema_upgrade (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets) >rpmlint libmeegotouch-qtstyle-0.20.25-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm libmeegotouch-qtstyle.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin -> plug in, plug-in, plugging libmeegotouch-qtstyle.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin -> plug in, plug-in, plugging OK libmeegotouch-qtstyle.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK, in main package libmeegotouch-qtstyle.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtstylekinetic libmeegotouch-qtstyle.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtstyledialogs libmeegotouch-qtstyle.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtstyleexample OK > rpmlint libmeegotouch-devel-0.20.25-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/include/meegotouch/mrichtexteditstyle.h Fix it, please. libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mapplettester libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mapplicationextensiontester libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dui-rename-files libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mgen libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mnotificationtool libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary widgetsgallery libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dui-rename-symbols libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mmoc libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mmoc.pl libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary m-servicefwgen libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mnotificationstresstest libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary animatedlayout libmeegotouch-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary applicationextensiondemo OK Summary - not OK (need comment/fix). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-10-05 04:40:16 EDT --- rpmlint libmeegotouch.spec libmeegotouch.spec:92: W: configure-without-libdir-spec OK, libdir specified libmeegotouch.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean libmeegotouch.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag libmeegotouch.spec: W: no-%clean-section OK, F14+ only libmeegotouch.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libmeegotouch-0.20.25.tar.bz2 OK, extracted from upstream src.rpm, commented -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-10-05 03:44:36 EDT --- > > Still there's an issue with fdupes probably. > > > > + %fdupes > > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libmeegotouch-0.20.25-3.12.x86_64/usr/share > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU: line 44: fg: no job control > > RPM build errors: > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU (%install) > > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU (%install) > > You may use SRPM from meego upstream, %fudpes is a SUSE specific macro. > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506423 Ah, sorry - you're right, by mistake I used upstream src.rpm :( (Downloaded in a same directory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-10-05 02:56:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created attachment 451396 [details] > qmake in qtdir to qmake-qt4 > > I'm able to build it with this patch - it directly takes qmake-qt4 (not qmake > - > it's qt 3 one!). I don't think this patch is needed, my latest spec already export QTDIR before ./configure. (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 451421 [details] > widgetsgallery demo dso - librt > > This patch fixes librt DSO. > > Still there's an issue with fdupes probably. > > + %fdupes > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libmeegotouch-0.20.25-3.12.x86_64/usr/share > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU: line 44: fg: no job control > RPM build errors: > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU (%install) > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU (%install) You may use SRPM from meego upstream, %fudpes is a SUSE specific macro. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-10-04 10:54:00 EDT --- Created attachment 451421 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=451421 widgetsgallery demo dso - librt This patch fixes librt DSO. Still there's an issue with fdupes probably. + %fdupes /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libmeegotouch-0.20.25-3.12.x86_64/usr/share /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU: line 44: fg: no job control RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU (%install) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTKNCU (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-10-04 08:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Patches: do we really need all patches? at least missing-Epoch-function is > > not > > needed anymore as we have Qt 4.7, please update > > I removed patch5 from spec. All other patches are remained, they are all > extracted from upstream SRPM, I think it'll be easier to track upstream RPM > and > bugzilla system closely. Agreed. > Currently, I track F14 with Meego 1.1 which will be released on 2010-10-27. It's getting closer! > > Build: not ok > > > > + ./configure -prefix /usr -libdir /usr/lib64 -release > > > > QTDIR variable was set but could not find /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/qmake\n > > If your Qt is in a nonstandard location, try: > > QTDIR= ./configure > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bm6HwK (%build) > > > It's weird, I can build the package in rawhide koji. Maybe this issue is > trigger once the system has both qt3-devel and qt-devel installed. I'll check it - it should call qmake-qt4. > > > > PS; could you add me as co-maintainer to MeeGo packages once reviewed? I'm > > Qt > > co-maintainer and Fedora Mobility guy from Qt/Plasma Netbook side of evil. > > Thanks. > > OK, please also apply co-maintainer for exsited meego packages in pkgdb(e.g. > libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt contextkit libqttracker). Great, applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-10-04 09:13:05 EDT --- Created attachment 451396 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=451396 qmake in qtdir to qmake-qt4 I'm able to build it with this patch - it directly takes qmake-qt4 (not qmake - it's qt 3 one!). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-10-01 11:57:02 EDT --- New Links: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/libmeegotouch-0.20.25-2.fc13.src.rpm http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/libmeegotouch.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-10-01 09:24:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Patches: do we really need all patches? at least missing-Epoch-function is not > needed anymore as we have Qt 4.7, please update I removed patch5 from spec. All other patches are remained, they are all extracted from upstream SRPM, I think it'll be easier to track upstream RPM and bugzilla system closely. Currently, I track F14 with Meego 1.1 which will be released on 2010-10-27. > Build: not ok > > + ./configure -prefix /usr -libdir /usr/lib64 -release > > QTDIR variable was set but could not find /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/qmake\n > If your Qt is in a nonstandard location, try: > QTDIR= ./configure > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bm6HwK (%build) > It's weird, I can build the package in rawhide koji. Maybe this issue is trigger once the system has both qt3-devel and qt-devel installed. > > PS; could you add me as co-maintainer to MeeGo packages once reviewed? I'm Qt > co-maintainer and Fedora Mobility guy from Qt/Plasma Netbook side of evil. > Thanks. OK, please also apply co-maintainer for exsited meego packages in pkgdb(e.g. libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt contextkit libqttracker). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-09-29 09:39:14 EDT --- Name: ok Summary: ok Version & Release: ok Group: ok License: ok URL: ok Sources: caedf70a5851e2d1e1e9c282f40c841a ok Patches: do we really need all patches? at least missing-Epoch-function is not needed anymore as we have Qt 4.7, please update Requires & BuildRequires: XXX Description: ok Build: not ok + ./configure -prefix /usr -libdir /usr/lib64 -release QTDIR variable was set but could not find /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/qmake\n If your Qt is in a nonstandard location, try: QTDIR= ./configure error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bm6HwK (%build) PS; could you add me as co-maintainer to MeeGo packages once reviewed? I'm Qt co-maintainer and Fedora Mobility guy from Qt/Plasma Netbook side of evil. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632051] Review Request: libmeegotouch - MeeGo Touch Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||614297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
