[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 11:33:31 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 |erlang-lfe-0.6.1-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-23 16:51:23 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 |erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-23 16:57:09 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-17 08:27:44 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-11-17 01:19:27 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-11-17 01:19:27 EST --- Ok, the package is available in Rawhide so I'm closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-15 09:20:53 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-15 09:59:58 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-15 09:59:50 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-15 17:15:53 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-lfe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278
--- Comment #10 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-11-14 12:42:53
EST ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
(+) rpmlint is not silent, some messages can be ignored:
- spelling errors are false positives
- only-non-binary-in-usr-lib and no-binary: general Erlang packaging problem
which cannot
be avoided in the package
- Explicit lib dependency is required, as no shared lib that can be
auto-detected
- no-documentation: I suggest adding README and COPYRIGHT file (see below),
there is also documentation in doc/, why is it not included? You might also
want to include the examples as doc.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD).
- The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
- There is a COPYRIGHT file containing the license, it must be included in
the %doc section
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
package# sha256sum rvirding-lfe-v0.6.1-0-g1bcf461.tar.gz
e84a8c8e743badcae9438b66897210c6266f79d580fa9d67fa0dfcd0eff0d976
rvirding-lfe-v0.6.1-0-g1bcf461.tar.gz
downloaded# sha256sum ~/download/rvirding-lfe-v0.6.1-0-g1bcf461.tar.gz
e84a8c8e743badcae9438b66897210c6266f79d580fa9d67fa0dfcd0eff0d976
~/download/rvirding-lfe-v0.6.1-0-g1bcf461.tar.gz
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
The documentation should be fixed, the inclusion of the COPYRIGHT file must be
fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-11-14 14:10:03 EST --- Made several docs fixes: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lfe.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2600681 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-11-14 15:45:13 EST --- Looks good to me now. You should document all changes in the changelog. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-11-15 00:15:49 EST --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: erlang-lfe Short Description: Lisp Flavoured Erlang Owners: peter Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(t...@niemueller.de ||) --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-11-12 11:01:16 EST --- Ping, Tim! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(t...@niemueller.de | |) | --- Comment #9 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-11-12 11:12:35 EST --- I'll review it this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-11-08 05:25:12 EST --- Thanks, Tim - your patch was applied: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lfe.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji build for F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2586465 rpmlint output: work ~: rpmlint Desktop/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-2.fc14.i686.rpm Desktop/emacs-erlang-lfe-* erlang-lfe.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib erlang-lfe.i686: E: no-binary erlang-lfe.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib emacs-erlang-lfe.noarch: W: no-documentation emacs-erlang-lfe-el.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elisp - Elis, Lisp, Elise emacs-erlang-lfe-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US elisp - lisp, e lisp, Elise emacs-erlang-lfe-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. work ~: All these messages should be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||t...@niemueller.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@niemueller.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-10-31 15:14:38 EDT --- I'll take it. I'm using emacs daily, and though I'm not profound in writing code for it, I'll have a look anyway. Maybe I can help out with some experience from emacs-lua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #6 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2010-10-31 19:37:06 EDT --- Created attachment 456769 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=456769 Patch to create emacs packages This patch adds sub-packages for the Emacs major mode that is included in the package. From a short test the mode seems to work fine in Emacs. The patch also includes inconsistent macro usage. Please apply and try and upload the new version then somewhere for the final review. From a first glance looks good so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-25 10:48:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) 2.) It may be nice, if you can create emacs-* subpackages. Yes, indeed. I'll try to provide them (unfortunately I'm not an emacs user, so I can't test them). Unfortunately that was harder that I thought initially. So I'd rather to postpone the creation of (x)emacs sub-packages until someone well-familiar with (x)emacs will step in and help me with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2010-10-15 13:06:04 EDT --- Some prereview comments: 1,) A better explanation of how you have generate the upstram archive may be helpful 2.) It may be nice, if you can create emacs-* subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2010-10-15 13:12:39 EDT --- Item 1 has been clarified for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-10-15 13:25:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) 2.) It may be nice, if you can create emacs-* subpackages. Yes, indeed. I'll try to provide them (unfortunately I'm not an emacs user, so I can't test them). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639263 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
