[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Whiteboard|NotReady| Last Closed||2013-05-01 11:20:46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TTSWhJL56Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package-review@redha |package-review@lists.fedora |t.com |project.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018
--- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-12-10
14:04:54 EST ---
Sorry, it seems I have forgotton this review.
Then how about this issue?
(In reply to comment #2)
- And for the same reason, do filters of which the dependencies
are not found on Fedora really have to be removed?
The filter scripts don't seem to be loaded automatically.
That's correct. I will keep all those filters here.
So I think the lines like
--
51 rm -f %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir}/lib/nanoc3/filters/sass.rb
---
are not needed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mfoj...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #8 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-11-29 04:18:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. Hi, I was terribly busy last few weeks, sorry for this horrible delay. So I removed all filter dependencies and also bump version to 3.1.6. I keep rack dependency because it's required for 'server' functionality. === 3.1.6-1 === * Mon Nov 29 2010 Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com - 3.1.6-1 - Removed filter dependencies - Version bump Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-nanoc3.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-nanoc3-3.1.6-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27 11:23:40 EST --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-20 12:53:14 EST --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Bug 641018 depends on bug 641015, which changed state. Bug 641015 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cri - Cri is a library for building easy-to-use commandline tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641015 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-13 12:22:04 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mfoj...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-05 13:34:50 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 --- Comment #2 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-10-21 11:40:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Some questions first: * About Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filters/ - Are Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filers always required for this rpm? According to lib/nanoc3/filters.rb, filter scripts under lib/nanoc3/ are loaded only when actually using such filters, and when not using such filters the listed rpms don't seem to be needed. Yes that true. But to guarantee basic functionality for user, it's necessary to include that gems. Otherwise functionality that is related with those gems will be not available. And if they are already packaged for Fedora, I can't see the reason for omitting them as a dependencies. - And for the same reason, do filters of which the dependencies are not found on Fedora really have to be removed? The filter scripts don't seem to be loaded automatically. That's correct. I will keep all those filters here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-21 13:41:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Some questions first: * About Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filters/ - Are Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filers always required for this rpm? According to lib/nanoc3/filters.rb, filter scripts under lib/nanoc3/ are loaded only when actually using such filters, and when not using such filters the listed rpms don't seem to be needed. Yes that true. But to guarantee basic functionality for user, - So yes, we want to make rpms installed which is needed for basic functionality on this gem, however are all scripts under lib/nanoc3/filters classified as basic functionality for this rpm? For example, even without the rpms for the dependency of filters installed at all, $ ruby -rubygems -e 'require nanoc3 ; puts Nanoc3::VERSION' works. it's necessary to include that gems. Otherwise functionality that is related with those gems will be not available. - Just by default. So people can install the needed rpms afterwards when people wants to use the functionality. And if they are already packaged for Fedora, I can't see the reason for omitting them as a dependencies. - For people not using all of the filter functionality, not using unneeded rpms if possible is preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-20 16:21:07 EDT --- Some questions first: * About Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filters/ - Are Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filers always required for this rpm? According to lib/nanoc3/filters.rb, filter scripts under lib/nanoc3/ are loaded only when actually using such filters, and when not using such filters the listed rpms don't seem to be needed. - And for the same reason, do filters of which the dependencies are not found on Fedora really have to be removed? The filter scripts don't seem to be loaded automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfoj...@redhat.com Depends on||641015 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
