[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing - RELAX NG validator in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-11-27 15:37:04 EST --- On a quick look the only thing using the upstream source checkout would buy us would be that the test suite is included in it. I'll have a look at using it, and if I end up doing so, will also quite probably build trang and dtdinst from it since it's one checkout that contains them all (there's a separate review request for trang which would become obsolete). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing - RELAX NG validator in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-11-26 08:43:37 EST --- I have a suggestion/question. Wouldn't it make more sense to actually use upstream build system? You are using binary release with included sources that you compile manually...thus possibly creating differences from upstream (unknowingly). I know upstream doesn't do source releases, most packages I have seen/worked with actually use SCM checkouts to get sources and build instructions in those cases. Is there a good reason not to do that in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing - RELAX NG validator in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||socho...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-11-24 11:17:16 EST --- I'll do the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing - RELAX NG validator in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
