[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2017-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
 Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE



--- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1421506 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

James Hogarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
   Assignee|bor...@redhat.com   |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|needinfo?(rz...@redhat.com) |
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:57:37



--- Comment #15 from James Hogarth  ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #14)
> (In reply to James Hogarth from comment #13)
> > There has not been any comment in a long time.
> > 
> > Are you intending to progress this?
> > 
> > If there is no response within a week this bug will be closed as per policy.
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
> 
> Ricky no longer works at Red Hat (since Jan 2012).

Thanks Tom

I'll close this then so that it's not in the queue and if anyone else has
interest they can open a fresh review request.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088



--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #13)
> There has not been any comment in a long time.
> 
> Are you intending to progress this?
> 
> If there is no response within a week this bug will be closed as per policy.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

Ricky no longer works at Red Hat (since Jan 2012).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

James Hogarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com,
   ||rz...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(rz...@redhat.com)



--- Comment #13 from James Hogarth  ---
There has not been any comment in a long time.

Are you intending to progress this?

If there is no response within a week this bug will be closed as per policy.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell  2012-03-28 09:54:25 EDT ---
Latest upstream version, 110.74 should also build on 3.x kernels.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Robert Knight  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kni...@princeton.edu

--- Comment #10 from Robert Knight  2012-03-28 09:41:16 
EDT ---
This will let it build on later kernels

diff -uNr config/_arch-n-opsys config-new/_arch-n-opsys
--- config/_arch-n-opsys 2011-03-22 09:30:14.0 -0400
+++ config-new/_arch-n-opsys 2012-03-28 08:57:09.729873343 -0400
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
2.4.*) ;;
2.5.*) ;;
2.6.*) ;;
+   3.*) ;;
*) exit 1 ;;
  esac
  ;;

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2012-01-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Simon Green  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Iain Arnell  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||iarn...@gmail.com

--- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell  2011-10-24 01:56:22 EDT ---
Ricky,

it fails to build in rawhide and f16:

./config/install.sh: Using shell /bin/sh.
./config/install.sh: SML root is /builddir/build/BUILD/smlnj-110.73.
./config/install.sh: Installation directory is
/builddir/build/BUILD/smlnj-110.73.
./config/install.sh: Installing version 110.73.
./config/install.sh: URL of source archive is
http://smlnj.cs.uchicago.edu/dist/working/110.73/.
./config/install.sh: !!! Script
/builddir/build/BUILD/smlnj-110.73/bin/.arch-n-opsys fails on this machine.
./config/install.sh: !!! You must patch this by hand and repeat the
installation.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Bv0cKg (%build)


Checking bin/.arch-n-opsys, I see that it's explicitly checking `uname -r`
against 2.[2-6].* and failing because the kernel's been bumped to 3.x now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #7 from Brock Organ  2011-10-22 12:02:51 EDT ---
Hi Ricky,

What is the next part of the review request?

Regards,

Brock

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Brock Organ  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bor...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #6 from Brock Organ  2011-10-22 11:38:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> From a fresh F15 install 

For others trying to reproduce this behavior, let me be clear:

My fresh F15 install was a default "Software Development" install on x86_64 ...


> yum -y install glibc-devel.i686 libgcc.i686
> wget http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
> rpm -Uvh smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
> cd rpmbuild/SPECS/
> rpmbuild --target i686 -ba smlnj.spec
> rpm -Uvh /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.i686.rpm
> /usr/bin/sml
> 

Regards,

Brock

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #5 from Brock Organ  2011-10-22 11:29:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hey, glad to have some eyes on this package :-)

Hi Ricky,

Glad to help, thank you for your packages! :D

> 
> It doesn't build on x86_64 because smlnj does not support x86_64 (see the last
> FAQ entry at http://www.smlnj.org/dist/working/110.73/NOTES/INSTALL).  
> Luckily,
>  the 32-bit version builds and runs fine on an x86_64 machine.  Just install
> glibc-devel.i686 and libgcc.i686, and you should be able to build it with
> rpmbuild --target i686 -ba smlnj.spec (I usually find it more convenient to
> just do a koji scratch build though).

>From a fresh F15 install (needed because the glibc-devel.i686 and libcc.i686
packages need to match n-v-r with the already installed ones, and an older F15
install might not match) I was able to download, compile from source, and
install the smlnj packages from your url:

yum -y install glibc-devel.i686 libgcc.i686
wget http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
rpm -Uvh smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
cd rpmbuild/SPECS/
rpmbuild --target i686 -ba smlnj.spec
rpm -Uvh /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.i686.rpm
/usr/bin/sml

Thanks for your help, Ricky! :D

Regards,

Brock

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #4 from Ricky Zhou  2011-10-21 12:21:02 EDT ---
Hey, glad to have some eyes on this package :-)

It doesn't build on x86_64 because smlnj does not support x86_64 (see the last
FAQ entry at http://www.smlnj.org/dist/working/110.73/NOTES/INSTALL).  Luckily,
 the 32-bit version builds and runs fine on an x86_64 machine.  Just install
glibc-devel.i686 and libgcc.i686, and you should be able to build it with
rpmbuild --target i686 -ba smlnj.spec (I usually find it more convenient to
just do a koji scratch build though).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Brock Organ  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |bor...@redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #3 from Brock Organ  2011-10-21 10:09:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm not able to build with this spec file using F14:
> 
> $ rpmbuild -ba smlnj.spec 
> error: Architecture is not included: x86_64
> $ 

I get the same error with F15 on x86_64 ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-10-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

Brock Organ  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bor...@redhat.com

--- Comment #2 from Brock Organ  2011-10-21 10:06:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj.spec
> SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
> 
> Updated to latest upstream version (110.73).

I'm not able to build with this spec file using F14:

$ rpmbuild -ba smlnj.spec 
error: Architecture is not included: x86_64
$ 

Here are the steps to reproduce:

wget http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
rpm -Uvh smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm
cd rpmbuild/SPECS/
rpmbuild -ba smlnj.spec

Regards,

Brock

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 670088] Review Request: smlnj - Standard ML of New Jersey

2011-05-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088

--- Comment #1 from Ricky Zhou  2011-05-30 03:20:16 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj.spec
SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/smlnj-110.73-1.fc15.src.rpm

Updated to latest upstream version (110.73).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review