[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-06-21 13:06:07 EDT ---
mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.201
   ||10130hg.fc15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-06-21 13:06:13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-06-11 00:31:35 EDT ---
mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15
testing repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-06-09 16:55:41 EDT ---
mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #10 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-04-25 05:54:58 EDT 
---
Thanks for the review, Sebastian.

There hasn't been a commit upstream in 11 months:
http://c3p0.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/c3p0/

So I think we can safely say that we have the latest code. ;-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #11 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-04-25 05:57:59 EDT 
---
I should also say, that because we generate our own tarball from the upstream
source control, the md5sums will likely always be different due to timestamps.
This is a common problem for packages whose upstream do not ship tarballs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #12 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-04-25 06:01:26 EDT 
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mchange-commons
Short Description: A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Owners: mbooth
Branches: F-15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-25 13:01:13 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com 2011-04-17 21:58:33 
EDT ---
Mat, when I get a spare minute, I will. :)

Here's the official review. It looks pretty good so far. Could you pull again
from upstream to make sure we get the latest version and match upstream? Also,
according to the guidelines, you 'should' query upstream to include the license
file, but I'm not going to block on that.

Please pull the latest version and go ahead then.

Otherwise: APPROVED.

[  OK  ] specfiles match:
55b22670abfe91bcd3b25625d58da15b131f6f911f8ff37ffdb4644aa937ef73
[ FAIL ] source files match upstream:

2b7c533be6f083239cc215bf850d39cbf5b5cafd59e0b5cd2ee1126db3b219bf is the latest
upstream
d2050642f67e7566e9878575e75ba81a973747c673079de605326d67594a1fda is being
packaged

[  OK  ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[  OK  ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
[  OK  ] dist tag is present.
[  NA  ] build root is correct.
[  OK  ] license field matches the actual license.
[  OK  ] license is open source-compatible.
[ FAIL ] license text included in package.
[  OK  ] latest version is being packaged.
[  OK  ] BuildRequires are proper.
[  NA  ] compiler flags are appropriate.
[  OK  ] %clean is present. 
[  OK  ] package builds in mock.
[  OK  ] package installs properly.
[  NA  ] debuginfo package looks complete.
[  OK  ] rpmlint is silent.

[sebastian@bear rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
./RPMS/noarch/mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc14.noarch.rpm 
mchange-commons.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[  OK  ] final provides and requires are sane
[  NA  ] %check is present and all tests pass:
[  OK  ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[  OK  ] owns the directories it creates. 
[  OK  ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[  OK  ] no duplicates in %files.
[  OK  ] file permissions are appropriate.
[  NA  ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page.
[  OK  ] code, not content.
[  NA  ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[  NA  ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[  OK  ] no headers.
[  OK  ] no pkgconfig files.
[  OK  ] no libtool .la droppings.
[  NA  ] desktop files valid and installed properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #8 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-04-16 05:12:04 EDT 
---
Hi Sebastian,

Are you going to take 645009 as well?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||sebast...@when.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sebast...@when.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com 2011-04-09 13:42:40 
EDT ---
Alright, given that both c3p0 and this work now well together, I think we're
good to go, especially since it doesn't seem like upstream is moving
immediately. Taking this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||675009

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #6 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-02-01 11:56:15 EST 
---
I guess we shouldn't review this package (and c3p0) until we know what is going
to happen upstream:
https://github.com/ether/pad/issuesearch?state=openq=c3p0#issue/219

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||akurt...@redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 
10:48:14 EST ---
Is there a reason to not have javadoc subpackage?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #2 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-01-31 11:13:19 EST 
---
Not especially, just the ant script doesn't build them. c3p0 will probably be
the only package that will be using this mchange-commons, do you think it's
worth me patching the build?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 
11:17:35 EST ---
It's worth it at least for consistency sake. Our users are/should expect a
javadoc subpackage to exist.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #5 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-01-31 12:50:01 EST 
---
Sorry, typo in the srpm url:

Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mchange-commons.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mchange-commons-0.2-0.3.20110130hg.fc14.src.rpm

Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2753386

Rpmlint:
mchange-commons.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082

--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-01-31 12:49:01 EST 
---
Ok, now we build the Javadocs :-)

Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mchange-commons.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mchange-commons-0.3-0.2.20110130hg.fc14.src.rpm

Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2753386

Rpmlint:
mchange-commons.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review