[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14 |tweepy-1.8-1.fc16 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-10 16:50:56 EST --- tweepy-1.8-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-08 04:53:01 EST --- tweepy-1.8-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tweepy-1.8-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-05 01:20:01 EDT --- tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-05 01:20:17 EDT --- tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 |tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 20:46:23 EST --- tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tweepy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-03-01 23:42:59 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-03-01 23:42:59 EST --- Bug closed. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 00:43:23 EST --- Package tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 14 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-01 00:43:31 EST --- Package tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 13 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc13 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-02-24 13:28:15 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #11 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2011-02-22 21:34:42 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: tweepy Short Description: Twitter library for python Owners: rtnpro Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: rtnpro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #12 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-23 02:16:06 EST --- You should change fedora-cvs to ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #9 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2011-02-21 04:12:05 EST --- Made the necessary changes. Spec URL: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/tweepy.spec SRPM URL: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/tweepy-1.7.1-3.fc14.src.rpm Koji Url: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2853546 Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104
Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-21 07:55:22 EST
---
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
* OK
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
* OK
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
* OK
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
* OK
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
* OK (MIT)
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
* OK
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
* OK (MIT_LICENSE from git repo)
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
* OK
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
* OK:
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
* OK
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
* OK
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile
* OK
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines
* OK
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
* N/A
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
* N/A
# MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
* OK
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
* N/A
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [13]
* OK
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)[14]
* OK
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [15]
* OK
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
* OK
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
* OK
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
* OK
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
* OK
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19]
* OK
# MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package. [19]
* NA
# MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} [21]
* NA
# MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.[20]
* OK
# MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[22]
* NA
# MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
* OK
# MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24]
* OK
ACCEPT
This package is approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #3 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2011-02-05 08:28:27 EST --- I updated the SPEC file for tweepy taking into account the above suggestions. I also did a mock build on my system and it completed successfully. I have uploaded the latest SPEC and SRPM files. Spec URL: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/tweepy.spec SRPM URL: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/tweepy-1.7.1-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@zhukoff.net --- Comment #4 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-05 08:35:09 EST --- I'll review it -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-05 09:06:22 EST ---
Upstream sources has *py in its name. It's ok
rpmlint output is clean. It's ok
-- Please remove %clean section because F12 is currently unsupported or add
BuildRoot tag if you want build package for EPEL
-- Please add python2-devel if you package for Python2 only, python3-devel if
you package for Python3 only. A package that has both python2 and python3 files
will need to BuildRequire both.
Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
-- Please remove python from BuildRequires because python-devel already has
python in deplist
-- Each source file contains point to LICENSE but there is not LICENSE file. So
you SHOULD query upstream to include it.See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text for
additional info
-- There's also no need to use %{__rm} for rm command, although there is
currently no guideline forbidding it. Please replace pointless macros or give
reasons to use it.
--
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104
--- Comment #6 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2011-02-05 11:06:09
EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
-- Please remove %clean section because F12 is currently unsupported or add
BuildRoot tag if you want build package for EPEL
Currently, I am packaging it only for Fedora. If it is error-free, I will
package it for EPEL.
-- Please add python2-devel if you package for Python2 only, python3-devel if
you package for Python3 only. A package that has both python2 and python3
files
will need to BuildRequire both.
Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
As far as I know, python2-devel doesn't exist in yum repository, there exists
python-devel ( for python2) and python3-devel.
-- Please remove python from BuildRequires because python-devel already has
python in deplist
done.
-- Each source file contains point to LICENSE but there is not LICENSE file.
So
you SHOULD query upstream to include it.See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text for
additional info
There is a LICENSE file in the root of the src dir.
-- There's also no need to use %{__rm} for rm command, although there is
currently no guideline forbidding it.
Do I remove the %{__rm} macro from %install section also?
Please replace pointless macros or give
reasons to use it.
Please mention the pointless macros.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-05 12:08:48 EST ---
Please mention the pointless macros.
you can find additional info here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311#c9 macros starting with __
is pointless because they do nothing
Do I remove the %{__rm} macro from %install section also?
Yes, you do
There is a LICENSE file in the root of the src dir.
I've check twice: There's no LICENSE file in src dir of your SRPM but it is in
Git repo. Currently, your package doesn't contain license text but it contain
11 points to this one
grep -R LICENSE * | wc -l
11
Please contact upstream to clarify this situation (create github's issue, send
mail or other). If LICENSE is MIT you can bring LICENSE file as Source1 or
Patch (with bug id, mail id in comment) for example, you should add it to %doc
list of %files section and I'll aprove tweepy package.
As far as I know, python2-devel doesn't exist in yum repository, there exists
python-devel ( for python2) and python3-devel.
Ok.sorry. I think PythonPackaging Guidelines is out-of-date
If it is error-free, I will package it for EPEL.
You have to add
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
to your spec file.
Summary: Please replace pointless macros, add BuildRoot (or remove %clean) and
fix LICENSE issue for approving
--
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104
Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pa...@zhukoff.net
--- Comment #1 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-04 13:20:06 EST ---
A few comments
- There's also no need to use %{__rm} for rm command, although there is
currently no guideline forbidding it.
- you've removed BuildRoot section, so you can't push package to EPEL but you
haven't removed %clean section (it is not required for F-13 and above
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean)
- you should point setuptools in BuildRequired. Because koji build is failed.
--
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675104] Review Request: tweepy - Twitter library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675104 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Zhukov pa...@zhukoff.net 2011-02-04 14:05:27 EST --- Please correct License tag (I can see MIT in README and PKG-INFO file, but you point Python in License tag). Also all files contain link to LICENSE file, but there is not one in SRPM. After that I'll start Review process. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
