Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690954
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-02
20:21:33 EDT ---
Review for 4494cd46098d379815e9df41842df4cd postler-0.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/postler-*
postler.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automagic - automatic,
auto magic, auto-magic
postler.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vala - lava, val, ala
postler.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automagic - automatic,
auto magic, auto-magic
postler.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary postler
postler.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary postler-mbsync
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2+
FIX - MUST: License field in spec file does not match the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
02e502c9f4a4b92e4ace32d9e268f06d
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: library files that end in .so are in the -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
OK - MUST: Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file is properly validated with desktop-file-validate
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK - Should: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
WELL - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
N/A - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
N/A - SHOULD: package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok
OK - Debuginfo complete
OK - SHOULD: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
N/A - SHOULD: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files should 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
Issues:
- License is LGPLv2+ and not LGPLv2 because there is a or any later version
clause.
- The icon should have a different name as explained in comment #4.
- Require dexxter once it's in the repo.
- Does not build on rawhide:
Waf: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/postler-0.1.1/_build_'
[ 1/44] valac: postler/dexter.vala postler/dockmanager.vala
postler/elementary-entry.vala postler/postler-accounts.vala
postler/postler-accountsetup.vala postler/postler-app.vala
postler/postler-attachments.vala postler/postler-bureau.vala
postler/postler-cellrenderertoggle.vala postler/postler-client.vala
postler/postler-composer.vala postler/postler-content.vala
