[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-09-05 03:19:02 EDT --- It doesn't exist. I tried again and I can't switch to that branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-09-05 03:28:35 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: django-keyedcache New Branches: f15 Owners: sundaram pjp InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #15 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-09-05 03:29:31 EDT --- It just noticed I use the new package request instead of the change request. Filed it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-05 10:23:39 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-07-31 07:45:52 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: django-keyedcache Short Description: Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects Owners: sundaram Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-31 15:42:17 EDT --- Already exists? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-12 08:41:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 01:24:58 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: django-keyedcache New Branches: el6 Owners: sundaram pjp InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-10 03:09:03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-07-09 05:44:37 EDT --- Weird. Something has changed that causes the test to fail. Workaround it for now http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-keyedcache.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-keyedcache-1.4.1-2.fc15.src.rpm rpmlint throws a error about a empty file but that isn't a real issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-07-09
07:12:22 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i django-keyedcache.spec built/django-keyedcache-1.4.1-2.fc14.*.rpm
django-keyedcache.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mixins -
mixing, mix ins, mix-ins
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
django-keyedcache.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/keyedcache/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/django.po
django-keyedcache.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mixins -
mixing, mix ins, mix-ins
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK the website lists the license as New BSD license which
will be BSD 3 clause
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#New_BSD_.28no_advertising.2C_3_clause.29.
No LICENSE file is included.
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK, noarch package.
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK
%clean is ignored - present anyway. OK
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, none included.
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
Sources licensed with New BSD license.
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
No LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum django-keyedcache-1.4-1.tar.gz
49d50e6a44db5fe820108534496a7892 django-keyedcache-1.4-1.tar.gz
md5sum django-keyedcache-1.4.1-2.fc15.src/django-keyedcache-1.4-1.tar.gz
49d50e6a44db5fe820108534496a7892
django-keyedcache-1.4.1-2.fc15.src/django-keyedcache-1.4-1.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Noarch package built on x86_64 and i686.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro
[NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
One directory that is created by the package is not being owned by it. Attached
a patch to fix this.
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[NA]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix
(e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must
go in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[NA]MUST:
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-07-09 07:14:21 EDT --- Created attachment 512039 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=512039 Patch to fix directory ownership issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-07-09 10:37:22 EDT --- Thanks. Will fix and import New Package SCM Request === Package Name: django-keyedcache Short Description: Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects Owners: sundaram Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-09 19:17:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-07-08 06:24:52 EDT --- Hi Rahul, I am getting a build error for rawhide build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3186206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #1 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2011-07-06 10:56:30 EDT --- @lakshmi , are you planning on to do the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-07-06 11:16:56 EDT --- @Arun, Hi, yeah. Will do it by Friday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697492] Review Request: django-keyedcache - Utilities for simplified development of cache aware objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||saga...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
