[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2014-09-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Parag  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #13 from Parag  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: tabish-eeyek-fonts
New Branches: el6 epel7
Owners: pnemade

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2014-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586



--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2014-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #1 from Parag  2011-04-27 05:07:30 EDT ---
koji scratch build ->
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3029168

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mari...@freenet.de

--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann  2011-04-27 07:38:42 
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -v *
tabish-eeyek-fonts.src: I: checking
tabish-eeyek-fonts.src: I: checking-url http://tabish.freeshell.org/eeyek/
(timeout 10 seconds)
tabish-eeyek-fonts.src: I: checking-url
http://tabish.freeshell.org/eeyek/eeyek.zip (timeout 10 seconds)
tabish-eeyek-fonts.noarch: I: checking
tabish-eeyek-fonts.noarch: I: checking-url http://tabish.freeshell.org/eeyek/
(timeout 10 seconds)
tabish-eeyek-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0/copying.txt
tabish-eeyek-fonts.spec: I: checking-url
http://tabish.freeshell.org/eeyek/eeyek.zip (timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Looks good in general. The issue with the line endings can be solved with a
"sed" command:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #3 from Parag  2011-04-28 01:16:48 EDT ---
Spec URL:
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/tabish-eeyek-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm

koji scratch build ->http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3031898


package is not bumped here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann  2011-04-28 10:12:29 
EDT ---
Created attachment 495552
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495552
Change the FSF postal address to the current one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann  2011-04-28 10:13:12 
EDT ---
$ rpmlint -v *
...
tabish-eeyek-fonts.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0/copying.txt
...
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

The license blurb still contains the old FSF address, the new one is:

Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin Street, Suite 500
Boston, MA 02110-1335
USA

Apply the attached patch please.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Martin Gieseking  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de

--- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking  2011-04-28 
10:22:18 EDT ---
No, please don't change any files if it's not required to fix build problems.
Instead, ask upstream to apply the patch. Until then, just add the original
license file with the old address.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann  2011-04-28 15:44:40 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> No, please don't change any files if it's not required to fix build problems.
> Instead, ask upstream to apply the patch. Until then, just add the original
> license file with the old address.

OK, besides the wrong address I can't find any other issues.

-
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPLv2+
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
aedf4633caf5e7e2ccee24e9421085b5  eeyek.zip
aedf4633caf5e7e2ccee24e9421085b5  eeyek.zip.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
I assume the packager has tested it.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.



PACKAGE APPROVED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_

[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Parag  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #8 from Parag  2011-04-29 05:06:42 EDT ---
Thanks for the review!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tabish-eeyek-fonts 
Short Description: Font for Meetei Mayek script
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f15
InitialCC: i18n-team fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts  2011-04-30 14:12:34 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2011-05-03 00:39:01 EDT ---
tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-05-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2011-05-05 00:41:42 EDT ---
tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2011-06-03 22:56:27 EDT ---
tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 699586] Review Request: tabish-eeyek-fonts - Font for Meetei Mayek script

2011-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699586

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||tabish-eeyek-fonts-1.0-1.fc
   ||15
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-06-03 22:56:32

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review