[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-09 13:57:33 EDT --- Hi Shaun, if you are new to the packaging maintainers, I assume you need a sponsor, according to the guidelines. Am I right? If yes, you should set the flag "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" in "Blocks:". Although I'm unable to act as a sponsor, I will have a look at your package anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-09 14:12:00 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3060852 $ rpmlint -v * itstool.src: I: checking itstool.src: I: checking-url http://itstool.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) itstool.src: I: checking-url http://files.itstool.org/itstool/itstool-1.0.1.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) itstool.noarch: I: checking itstool.noarch: I: checking-url http://itstool.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) itstool.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary itstool itstool.spec: I: checking-url http://files.itstool.org/itstool/itstool-1.0.1.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Are you planning to add a manual page to itstool? Well, it is not mandatory, but would be fine to have it. Good old xml2po has a manpage, terribly outdated, but it has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Shaun McCance changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Shaun McCance 2011-05-09 14:19:27 EDT --- Thanks. I will need a sponsor. I've mostly only worked on the source tarball side of things. I'll add a manpage for 1.0.2. I think other distros are more strict about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Christopher Aillon changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cail...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Christopher Aillon 2011-05-24 11:23:36 EDT --- I'm able to sponsor, taking the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989
Christopher Aillon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Aillon 2011-05-24 12:54:21
EDT ---
Seems good with, but a few small issues are outlined at the end of this large
comment.
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. See comments below.
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. OK
MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. OK
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. NA
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA
MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK
MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. NA
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory. OK
MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. OK
MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK
MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). NA
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package. NA
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} NA
MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built. OK
MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
NA
MUST: Packages must not own files or
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Christopher Aillon changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(sha...@gnome.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Shaun McCance changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(sha...@gnome.org) | --- Comment #6 from Shaun McCance 2011-05-26 16:27:29 EDT --- Regarding the License field in the spec file, the COPYING file basically says "GPLv3+, but the ITS files can be modified and redistributed without restriction." I do have COPYING and COPYING.GPL3 in %doc, but should License say something else to reflect this? I assumed the License field is from a semi-controlled vocabulary. Presumably there are other packages that are GPL with exceptions. I added a man page to git. rpmlint did warn about that. I've always been told to use /usr/bin/env for python, perl, etc for portability. I don't know of any modern Linux distro that doesn't put python in /usr/bin, but I don't know about other Unixes. I guess I could just change it and wait for bug reports. (I notice that xml2po uses /usr/bin/python in the shebang, and I don't remember ever seeing a bug about that.) So here's what I'll do: * Drop BuildRoot, the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %install, and %clean * Change the shebang to "/usr/bin/python -s" upstream * Roll a 1.0.2 with the shebang change and the man page * Do a new spec file and SRPM with these changes Anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Christopher Aillon changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #7 from Christopher Aillon 2011-05-26 17:00:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Regarding the License field in the spec file, the COPYING file basically says > "GPLv3+, but the ITS files can be modified and redistributed without > restriction." I do have COPYING and COPYING.GPL3 in %doc, but should License > say something else to reflect this? I assumed the License field is from a > semi-controlled vocabulary. Presumably there are other packages that are GPL > with exceptions. It said under the terms of your choosing, and leaving the spec License field at GPLv3+ would comply. If you wanted to change the spec file to reflect that, it's probably "GPLv3+ and Copyright Only" but I'm not entirely sure that this is a) correct and b) necessary. Redirecting to spot and FE-Legal for the definitive answer, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Christopher Aillon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Christopher Aillon 2011-06-03 14:21:00 EDT --- Spot, ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-06-03 14:38:02 EDT --- I think License: GPLv3+ is appropriate here, unless you foresee a need for Fedora to distribute the ITS definitions under different terms. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #10 from Christopher Aillon 2011-06-03 18:01:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I think License: GPLv3+ is appropriate here, unless you foresee a need for > Fedora to distribute the ITS definitions under different terms. Cool, that's what I thought. (In reply to comment #6) > So here's what I'll do: > > * Drop BuildRoot, the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %install, and %clean > * Change the shebang to "/usr/bin/python -s" upstream > * Roll a 1.0.2 with the shebang change and the man page > * Do a new spec file and SRPM with these changes > > Anything else? I think that's it, once you provide a new spec/srpm for those, I'll approve the package and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Christopher Aillon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||z...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Christopher Aillon 2011-06-14 11:50:20 EDT --- *** Bug 713161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #12 from Zeeshan Ali 2011-06-14 15:18:25 EDT --- Yikes, I should have checked if anyone else is already on this before starting. :( Anyways, my packages are here, just in case you want to have a look for some reason: http://zeenix.fedorapeople.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #13 from Shaun McCance 2011-06-27 15:19:03 EDT --- http://people.gnome.org/~shaunm/itstool-rpm/itstool.spec http://people.gnome.org/~shaunm/itstool-rpm/itstool-1.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm I made a new release upstream. It has some new features and some fixes, but notably for the RPM, it now contains a man page, and the shebang is #!/usr/bin/python -s. I updated the spec file to remove the build root and clean stuff, per the packaging guidelines, and added the man page to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Christopher Aillon changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Christopher Aillon 2011-06-27 16:06:58 EDT --- Thanks for the update. F15 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3164638 There's still an rpmlint issue, but that aside, I think this is ready for approval. itstool.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-1 ['1.1.0-1.fc15', '1.1.0-1'] Please fix that by updating the rpm changelog before importing into git. Approving and sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #15 from Shaun McCance 2011-06-27 16:22:20 EDT --- Added the changelog entry in the spec file and replaced the spec and srpm files at the above URLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcla...@redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Matthias Clasen 2011-07-05 11:02:19 EDT --- Shaun, do you know what to do next here, or do you need help ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #17 from Mario Blättermann 2011-07-05 14:25:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Added the changelog entry in the spec file and replaced the spec and srpm > files > at the above URLs. Each time you change anything in the spec file, please bump the release number and build a new package. There is no other way to track your changes really. The %changelog has always to reflect what you did, means, consecutive changelog entries may not have the same release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #18 from Christopher Aillon 2011-07-05 14:46:55 EDT --- Mario, FWIW, I'm sponsoring and have already explained this to Shaun out of band. In this case, there was no %changelog entry whatsoever for the new changes, so I asked him to simply add one and replace the existing spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #19 from Mario Blättermann 2011-07-05 14:50:51 EDT --- OK, sorry for the noise ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Shaun McCance changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Shaun McCance 2011-07-05 15:40:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: itstool Short Description: Translate XML with PO files using rules from the W3C ITS Owners: shaunm Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2011-07-05 16:07:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-15 21:37:47 --- Comment #22 from Matthias Clasen 2011-07-15 21:37:47 EDT --- Build is done, so closing the bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Andrea Veri changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrea.v...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Andrea Veri 2012-04-17 07:56:29 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: itstool New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: averi InitialCC: averi I'll help mclasen maintaining itstool in both EL5 and EL6. He'll soon confirm my commit accesses on the relevant git branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #24 from Matthias Clasen 2012-04-17 07:59:34 EDT --- You should be all set with commit access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2012-04-17 09:28:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
