[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2011-06-28 16:27:32

--- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-06-28 16:27:32 
EDT ---
Built and released for all branches.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-23 13:43:04 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||emmanuel.seyman@club-intern
   ||et.fr
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.seyman@club-intern
   ||et.fr
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 
2011-05-21 11:14:00 EDT ---
Taking.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 
2011-05-21 14:40:42 EDT ---
=== KEY ===

 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===

 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items

Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire,
not a Require. Please fix your spec.

 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
 Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326

 [x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 License type: GPL+ or Artistic
 [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
cfc26405b47d498496e0c5557d2a9fb2  AuthCAS-1.5.tar.gz

 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===

 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
 Tested on: rawhide.x86_64
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
 Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [x] %check is present and the tests pass
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=2,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.01 sys +  0.11 cusr  0.02
csys =  0.16 CPU)
Result: PASS

NOT APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-05-21 14:50:01 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
  [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
 
 Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire,
 not a Require. Please fix your spec.
 
Yes, indeed. I was about to fix it when you posted.

http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AuthCAS.spec
http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 
2011-05-21 18:01:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)

 http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-05-21 23:26:41 
EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-AuthCAS
Short Description: Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Owners: xavierb
Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6
InitialCC: perl-sig


Thanks for the review Emmanuel :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377

Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||705382

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review