[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-28 16:27:32 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-06-28 16:27:32 EDT --- Built and released for all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-23 13:43:04 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.seyman@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-05-21 11:14:00 EDT --- Taking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-05-21 14:40:42 EDT --- === KEY === - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire, not a Require. Please fix your spec. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326 [x] Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. cfc26405b47d498496e0c5557d2a9fb2 AuthCAS-1.5.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: rawhide.x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3085326 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.16 CPU) Result: PASS NOT APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-05-21 14:50:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items Test::More is only used in the module's tests. It is therefore a BuildRequire, not a Require. Please fix your spec. Yes, indeed. I was about to fix it when you posted. http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-AuthCAS.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-05-21 18:01:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-AuthCAS-1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2011-05-21 23:26:41 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-AuthCAS Short Description: Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server Owners: xavierb Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks for the review Emmanuel :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705377] Review Request: perl-AuthCAS - Client library for CAS 2.0 authentication server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705377 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||705382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review