[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||libwebp-0.4.3-3.el6
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libwebp-0.4.3-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-04-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libwebp-0.4.3-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwebp-0.4.3-3.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389



--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libwebp-0.4.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwebp-0.4.3-1.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libwebp-0.4.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwebp-0.4.3-2.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com



--- Comment #16 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Note that libwebp is in RHEL7 proper, so no epel branch should be made.  But
thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||manisan...@gmail.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #15 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: libwebp
New Branches: el6 epel7
Owners: smani
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2015-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389



--- Comment #17 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Oh, ok, thanks for pointing out!

Package Change Request
==
Package Name: libwebp
New Branches: el6
Owners: smani
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #14 from John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net 2012-02-02 10:39:07 
EST ---
Just FYI.At http://www.graphviz.org/ there are new development snapshot
rpms of graphviz for fc17 that now include a libwebp plugin (graphviz-webp).   

Thanks for packaging libwebp.   Now its up to me to get a stable release of
graphviz posted.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 12:43:08 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #6)
 (In reply to comment #5)
 Peter, I'm waiting for Rahul to respond to comment 3. I then plan to approve
 this.

Ok, understood.

Scott, if anything went wrong, then we would flip roles - I'm willing to review
it if you take over this package. I really want to see this in Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #8 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 13:31:15 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Peter, I've mailed Rahul privately, asking if he has time to look at this or if
he'd object to me taking over package submission.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(methe...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |

--- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 19:12:07 EST 
---

Sorry for the delay folks.  I submitted this review many months back and forgot
about it entirely.  Thanks to Scott Tsai for the spec file changes and dropping
me a reminder offlist. 

http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/libwebp.spec
http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/libwebp-0.1.3-1.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #10 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 19:22:34 EST 
---
Successful koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3753938

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 19:48:12 
EST ---

Thanks.  Looks like it is going to be a dependency for a few packages and if
anyone wants to be a co-maintainer, feel free to apply.  I don't expect it to
be a big burden. 


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libwebp
Short Description: Library and tools for the WebP graphics format
Owners: sundaram
Branches: f17 f16
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 21:52:40 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

f17==devel, at least for a week for so yet. . .

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-02-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-02-01 23:42:23

--- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2012-02-01 23:42:23 
EST ---

@John Ellson,  I have built for Rawhide and Fedora 16 as well.  Do let me know
if you need any further help from me.   

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwebp-0.1.3-1.fc16

Closing this review request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lemen...@gmail.com
   Flag||needinfo?(methe...@gmail.co
   ||m)

--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 15:03:13 EST 
---
Hello. 
Folks, what's the current status of this ticket?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #6 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 16:47:34 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Peter, I'm waiting for Rahul to respond to comment 3. I then plan to approve
this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #4 from John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net 2012-01-19 14:00:21 
EST ---
If this library could be released for f16  f17, I could use it for the next
release of graphviz.   Upstream coding is completed and tested.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

--- Comment #2 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com 2012-01-15 19:25:39 EST ---
Created attachment 555405
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=555405
libwebp_jni_example.java

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2012-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||scottt...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|scottt...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #3 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com 2012-01-15 19:54:32 EST ---
I've made a copy of the SPEC with all my recommendations applied here:
http://scottt.tw/fedora/libwebp.spec for your convenience.

1. Please update to libwebp-0.1.3

Upstream released libwebp-0.1.3 in September 2011.
I've verified that simply bumping the version in the SPEC file works with the
new tarball:
http://code.google.com/p/webp/downloads/detail?name=libwebp-0.1.3.tar.gzcan=2q=

0.1.3 contains an ABI compatibility break and soname change from 0.1.2
(libwebp.so.0.0.0 - libwebp.so.2.0.0)
Thus packaging 0.1.3 directly avoids a soname change in the future.

2. Package the SWIG generated Java bindings:
 @@ -6,8 +6,11 @@ URL:  http://webmproject.org/
  Summary: Library and tools for the WebP graphics format
  # Additional IPR is licensed as well. See PATENTS file for details
  License: BSD
 -Source: http://webp.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 -BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel libpng-devel libtool 
 +Source0: http://webp.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 +Source1: libwebp_jni_example.java 
 +BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel libpng-devel libtool swig
 +BuildRequires: java-devel
 +BuildRequires: jpackage-utils

  %description
  WebP is an image format that does lossy compression of digital
 @@ -39,6 +42,16 @@ container based on RIFF. Webmasters, web developers and
browser
  developers can use WebP to compress, archive and distribute digital
  images more efficiently.

 +%package java
 +Group:  Development/Libraries
 +Summary: Java bindings for libwebp, a library for the WebP format
 +Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
 +Requires: java
 +Requires: jpackage-utils
 +
 +%description java
 +Java bindings for libwebp.
 +
  %prep
  %setup -q

 @@ -48,10 +61,35 @@ mkdir -p m4
  %configure --disable-static
  make %{?_smp_mflags}

 +# swig generated Java bindings
 +cp %{SOURCE1} .
 +cd swig
 +rm -rf libwebp.jar libwebp_java_wrap.c
 +mkdir -p java/com/google/webp
 +swig -ignoremissing -I../src -java \
 + -package com.google.webp  \
 + -outdir java/com/google/webp \
 + -o libwebp_java_wrap.c libwebp.i
 +
 +gcc %{optflags} -shared -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing \
 + -I/usr/lib/jvm/java/include \
 + -I/usr/lib/jvm/java/include/linux \
 + -I../src \
 + -L../src/.libs -lwebp libwebp_java_wrap.c \
 + -o libwebp_jni.so
 +
 +cd java
 +javac com/google/webp/libwebp.java
 +jar cvf ../libwebp.jar com/google/webp/*.class
 +
  %install
  make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
  find %{buildroot}/%{_libdir} -type f -name *.la -delete

 +# swig generated Java bindings
 +mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}-java
 +cp swig/*.jar swig/*.so %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}-java/
 +
  %post -n %{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig

  %postun -n %{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig
 @@ -69,6 +107,10 @@ find %{buildroot}/%{_libdir} -type f -name *.la
-delete
  %{_includedir}/*
  %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*

 +%files java
 +%doc libwebp_jni_example.java
 +%{_libdir}/%{name}-java/

The libwebp_jni_example.java file is attached to this bug.

3. Fix the dist tag:
 -Release:   1%{dist}
 +Release:   1%{?dist}

4. Fix the version number in the chanagelog:
 -* Wed May 25 2011 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org - 1.0.2-1
 +* Wed May 25 2011 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.3-1
As pointed out by Veeti.

5. Drop autoconf, automake from BuildRequires as pointed out by Veeti.

libtool already requires both autoconf and automake.
 -BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel, libpng-devel autoconf automake libtool 
 +BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel libpng-devel libtool 

6. Fix libwebp-devel's Require line as pointed out by Veeti:
 -Requires:  %{name} = %version
 +Requires:  %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package

7. Enclose RPM macros with curly braces as pointed out by Veeti:
 -make install DESTDIR=%buildroot
 -find %buildroot/%_libdir -type f -name *.la -delete
 +make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 +find %{buildroot}/%{_libdir} -type f -name *.la -delete

 -%post -n %name -p /sbin/ldconfig
 +%post -n %{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig

 -%postun -n %name -p /sbin/ldconfig
 +%postun -n %{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig

  %files tools
 -%_bindir/*
 -%_mandir/man*/*
 +%{_bindir}/*
 +%{_mandir}/man*/*

  %files -n %{name}
  %doc README PATENTS COPYING NEWS AUTHORS
 -%_libdir/%{name}*.so.*
 

[Bug 707389] Review Request: libwebp - Library and tools for the WebP graphics format

2011-07-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707389

Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi

--- Comment #1 from Veeti Paananen veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi 2011-07-21 
12:19:35 EDT ---
rpmlint:

[veeti@veeti-pc result]$ rpmlint *.rpm
libwebp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP - Web P, Web, Webb
libwebp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy - loss, glossy,
flossy
libwebp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec - codex, code,
codes
libwebp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP - Web P, Web,
Webb
libwebp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy - loss, glossy,
flossy
libwebp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec - codex, code,
codes
libwebp.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.2-1 ['0.1.2-1.fc15',
'0.1.2-1']
libwebp-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP - Web P,
Web, Webb
libwebp-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy - loss,
glossy, flossy
libwebp-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec - codex,
code, codes
libwebp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libwebp-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US WebP - Web P,
Web, Webb
libwebp-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy - loss,
glossy, flossy
libwebp-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec - codex,
code, codes
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.

---

Some informal comments:

- As mentioned by rpmlint, the changelog has an invalid version number.

- The build requirement for automake is unnecessary.

- The build requirements should probably be listed one per line.

- The devel package's base requirement should be fully versioned (Requires:
%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}).

- The tools package should also require the base package.

- You should enclose all the macros like %buildroot, etc. in curly braces (
%{buildroot} ).

- libjpeg-devel and libpng-devel are probably needed for using libwebp-devel,
so those should be explicit requirements. (?)

- The files for the base package should be listed first. The -n %{name} part
would then be unnecessary.

- The files should be selected more verbosely:

- Since the development headers are all contained in one folder, replace the
%_includedir/* line with %{_includedir}/webp/.

- Since there is only one pkgconfig file, just list it as libwebp.pc.

- The tools package should use something like %{_bindir}/*webp.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review