Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-aws-sdk - AWS SDK for Ruby

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723472

           Summary: Review Request: rubygem-aws-sdk - AWS SDK for Ruby
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mgold...@redhat.com
         QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: nott...@redhat.com,
                    package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---


Spec URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-aws-sdk/1/rubygem-aws-sdk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-aws-sdk/1/rubygem-aws-sdk-1.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description:

Build Ruby applications with the aws-sdk gem that takes the complexity
out of coding directly against the web service interfaces. The gem handles
common tasks, such as authentication, request retries, XML processing,
error handling, and more.

Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3214121

$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rubygem-aws-sdk-1.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 
rubygem-aws-sdk.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
rubygem-aws-sdk.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint ./rubygem-aws-sdk.spec 
./rubygem-aws-sdk.spec: W: no-%build-section
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to