[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf4-python.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf4-python-1.0-1.fix1.fc17.src.rpm * Thu May 24 2012 Orion Poplawski - 1.0-1.fix1 - Update to 1.0fix1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4423874 $ rpmlint -i -v * netcdf4-python.src: I: checking netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) netCDF -> netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US netCDF -> netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US NetCDF -> Netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zlib -> lib, glib, z lib The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlen -> glen, Olen, Glen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlens -> lens, glens, v lens The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.src: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/netcdf4-python/ (timeout 10 seconds) netcdf4-python.src: I: checking-url http://netcdf4-python.googlecode.com/files/netCDF4-1.0fix1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) netcdf4-python.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://netcdf4-python.googlecode.com/files/netCDF4-1.0fix1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. netcdf4-python.i686: I: checking netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) netCDF -> netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US netCDF -> netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US NetCDF -> Netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zlib -> lib, glib, z lib The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlen -> glen, Olen, Glen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlens -> lens, glens, v lens The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.i686: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/netcdf4-python/ (timeout 10 seconds) netcdf4-python.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nc4tonc3 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. netcdf4-python.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nc3tonc4 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. netcdf4-python.x86_64: I: checking netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) netCDF -> netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US netCDF -> netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US NetCDF -> Netted The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zlib -> lib, glib, z lib The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlen -> glen, Olen, Glen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlens -> lens, glens, v lens The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. netcdf4-python.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/netcdf4-python/ (timeout 10 seconds) netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nc4tonc3 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. netcdf4-python.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nc3tonc4 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. netcdf4-python3.i686: I: checking netcdf4-python3.i686: W: spellin
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski --- Bytecode issue is with rpmlint, see Bug 845972 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Bytecode issue is with rpmlint, see Bug 845972
Yes, indeed. Just tested the same files with an updated rpmlint, and the error
message doesn't appear anymore.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
57f8d598521cc5bce90ad70a4df5dcf4947e8ab0252e6803e272547d7910e97b
netCDF4-1.0fix1.tar.gz
57f8d598521cc5bce90ad70a4df5dcf4947e8ab0252e6803e272547d7910e97b
netCDF4-1.0fix1.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release}
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
rem
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: netcdf4-python Short Description: Python/numpy interface to netCDF Owners: orion Branches: f16 f17 f18 el6 el5 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-09-12 15:56:37 --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski --- Checked in and built. Thanks again everyone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Mathew Topper changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damm_ho...@yahoo.co.uk --- Comment #1 from Mathew Topper 2012-04-05 10:48:41 EDT --- I think this would be a good additional inclusion to Fedora. Considering other Jeff Whitaker packages are already included (such as python-basemap) and some of the examples for that package use netcdf4-python, I'm surprised its not already available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154(FE-SCITECH) --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2012-04-05 11:09:21 EDT --- Yeah, well, just need someone to review it :) http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf4-python.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf4-python-0.9.9-1.fc16.src.rpm * Thu Apr 5 2012 Orion Poplawski - 0.9.9-1 - Update to 0.9.9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736870] Review Request: netcdf4-python - Python/numpy interface to netCDF
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LooWHuTc7V&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
