[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1
   ||.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-02-17 18:48:20

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-17 18:48:20 EST ---
php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-09 19:56:35 EST ---
php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-08 12:16:37 EST ---
php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla  2012-02-08 11:33:09 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #10 from Remi Collet  2012-02-08 11:15:22 
EST ---
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms
Short Description: A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd
Owners: remi
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)  
2012-02-08 11:00:59 EST ---
Sorry for the delay.


Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 C/C++ 
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.


 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL5
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
 for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[ ]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: MUST No %config files under /usr.
[ ]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: MUST Package installs properly.
[ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm

php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mysql ->
myself
php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mysqli ->
myelitis
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


rpmlint php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-debuginfo-1.2.2-1.fc17.i686.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


rpmlint php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.fc17.i686.rpm

php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mysql ->
myself
php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mysqli ->
myelitis
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/pasha/SOFT/Review/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms/742729/mysqlnd_ms-1.2.2.tgz :
  MD5SUM this package : fad5095907aea981b9af41a66276c587
  MD5SUM upstream package : fad5095907aea981b9af41a66276c587

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pa...@hubbitus.info
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@hubbitus.info
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)  
2012-02-05 10:32:19 EST ---
I take it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet  2012-02-02 12:13:33 
EST ---
Update to 1.2.2 (new stable version)
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/4bcdaf2c90cfddafca0298656622c6c19bd57ca2

http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.2.2-1.remi.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-01-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet  2012-01-25 16:42:26 
EST ---
Again...
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/0cab1c4f4e4baabb90d35d739c44db49a1e1a208

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-01-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet  2012-01-25 15:55:53 
EST ---
Last PHP changes
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/51cc9f219e2cca5834b2b2f370be2578b76a5f19

http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.1.2-5.remi.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2012-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet  2012-01-21 13:25:46 
EST ---
Update spec to include conditional ZTS extension build (for fedora 17)

Changes:
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/d622a98b78ff25f94537c6ef4cc25df82bdea8bd

New SRPM:
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.1.2-4.remi.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2011-11-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet  2011-11-07 11:33:59 
EST ---
Update to 1.1.2 (stable)

SRPM :
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.1.2-1.remi.src.rpm

https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/72253f6a6d967f525d21c28996d23d708ece527a

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2011-10-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet  2011-10-14 16:53:34 
EDT ---
Update to 1.1.1
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/21f418970a4bd9f17655bcdd2f6ef4120b7c086a

SRPM:
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.1.1-1.remi.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729

Matthieu Saulnier  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||casper.le.fan...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Matthieu Saulnier  2011-10-04 
16:19:28 EDT ---
Hello
This is an informal review

[X] rpmlint must be run on every package.

[X] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.

[X] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.

[X] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.

[X] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
  Licensing Guidelines.

[X] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.

[X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
 the package must be included in %doc.

[X] The spec file must be written in American English.

[X] The spec file for the package MUST be legible.

[X] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
  provided in the spec URL.
  Upstream: a3606b52842879cf76d83fec187dc194
  Package:  a3606b52842879cf76d83fec187dc194

[X] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
 least one primary architecture.
 Build successful on Mock fedora-rawhide-x86_64

[NA] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
  architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
  ExcludeArch.

[X] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
 inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.

[NA] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
  %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.

[NA] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
  files(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
  must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.

[X] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.

[NA] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
  this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
  relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
  considered a blocker.

[X] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
 a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
 create that directory.

[X] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
  %files listings. 

[X] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
 executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
 %defattr(...) line.

[X] Each package must consistently use macros.

[X] The package must contain code, or permissable content.

[NA] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.

[X] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
 of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
 properly if it is not present.

[NA] Header files must be in a -devel package.

[NA] Static libraries must be in a -static package.

[NA] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
  then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
  package.

[NA] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
  package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
  %{version}-%{release}.

[X] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
  in the spec if they are built.

[NA] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
  and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
  %install section.

[X] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
  packages.

[X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review