[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16 |ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc14

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-11-10 12:24:02 EST ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc14 |ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc15

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2011-11-10 12:45:09 EST ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-11-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||751722

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-11-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||ghc-cryptohash

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2011-11-04 21:35:59

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-04 
21:35:59 EDT ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-26 07:56:13 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-26 
10:53:29 EDT ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-26 
10:53:46 EDT ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-26 
10:53:39 EDT ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc14

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-26 
15:04:46 EDT ---
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-10-25 
21:09:35 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.

rpmlint  -i ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16.src.rpm
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
ghc-cryptohash-devel-0.7.4-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm  ../ghc-cryptohash.spec 
ghc-cryptohash.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Crypto - Crypt, Crypts,
Crypt o
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-cryptohash.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US crypto - crypt,
crypts, crypt o
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-cryptohash.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Crypto - Crypt,
Crypts, Crypt o
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-cryptohash.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US crypto - crypt,
crypts, crypt o
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-cryptohash-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US crypto -
crypt, crypts, crypt o
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming - Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK, BSD no advertising 3 clause
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag  - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package

[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
BSD 3 clause no advertising.
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc15.src/cryptohash-0.7.4.tar.gz 
1e04911c7d89f0f76633baa1cb40 
ghc-cryptohash-0.7.4-1.fc15.src/cryptohash-0.7.4.tar.gz

md5sum cryptohash-0.7.4.tar.gz 
1e04911c7d89f0f76633baa1cb40  cryptohash-0.7.4.tar.gz

[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the

[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|Ready   |
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-10-25 23:53:22 EDT 
---
Thank you for the review. :)


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: ghc-cryptohash
Short Description: Haskell crypto hashes
Owners: petersen
Branches: f16 f15 f14 el6
InitialCC: haskell-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-haskell-list@redhat.
   ||com
  Status Whiteboard||Ready

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 748312] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash - Haskell crypto hashes

2011-10-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748312

--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-10-24 01:20:13 EDT 
---
This is needed by hakyll and tls (authenticate).

http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/cryptohash

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review