[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4DBJjLeAk8a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2013-01-01 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-01-01 23:57:22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N9iLipzjkTa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2013-01-01 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=whk3DIk9uLa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yXaV4quGoYa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F1iZcf4toOa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ipGoYVnMqda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ApxyKbwWeia=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4PJZh0GsZoa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-10-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #17 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---


Thanks for the review!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: lv2-mdala-plugins
Short Description: LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins
Owners: bsjones
Branches: f16 f17 f18
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #16 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com ---
Sorry James, been a bit crazy mine end workwise - will jump on this ASAP.
Thanks for the review!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #15 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Brendan, are you out there?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #14 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Brendan: ping.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #13 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Sorry for the delay.  It's crunch time at work.

That takes care of the last of my concerns, so this package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #12 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2012-05-18 
05:27:17 EDT ---
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins.spec
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm

Thanks again. Changelog updated.

I have updated the wscript to honour Fedora coimpiler flags and removed the
line encoding script and left the verbose flag in for good measure

The .so's are actually the plugin binaries themselves and are required

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #8 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2012-05-16 
10:34:04 EDT ---
OK - upstream has officially released this:

SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins.spec
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0.fc17.src.rpm

ta

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2012-05-16 15:10:28 EDT 
---
I'm getting an HTTP 404 on that SRPM URL.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2012-05-16 
15:47:59 EDT ---
My apologies:

SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins.spec
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm

thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #11 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2012-05-16 17:40:38 EDT 
---
No problem.  It's not like I've never done that. :-)

There is no %changelog entry for the new release.

I couldn't tell if the right CFLAGS were being used for compilation, so I added
-v to the waf build invocation.  They aren't.  The compiler is being invoked
like this (plus some -I and -D options):

/usr/lib/ccache/g++ -O0 -g -fshow-column -fPIC filename.cpp

The file COPYING is ASCII with Unix line endings, so the sed and iconv
invocations in %prep create an exact duplicate of the original file.

rpm -q --provides lv2-mdala-plugins shows a bunch of .so files (Ambience.so,
Bandisto.so, etc.).  Is that correct, or should those be filtered out?

Everything else looks okay.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 
15:55:25 EST ---
Hi Jerry,

this may be on hold for a while. I have this other LV@ plugin if interested bug
760270

cheers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2011-11-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #4 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 
03:08:16 EST ---
Hi Jerry, thanks for the review!

I've removed the README form the encoding fix and dropped the buildroot tag.

RPM_OPT_FLAGS and %{optflags} are interchangeable [1]

From what I know the waf is not so concerned with backwards compatibility as
other build tools (such as cmake) and recommends shipping the waf script. There
are no clear guidelines on this - the version of waf used here is actually
earlier than the one in f16, so I will leave as is.  

I have contacted the author with regards to the incorrect license file, stay
tuned.

thanks

Brendan

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2011-11-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 13:41:01 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #4)
 RPM_OPT_FLAGS and %{optflags} are interchangeable [1]

Errr, yeah, I knew that.  I don't know how I overlooked that %{optflags}.  Must
be time to go see the eye doctor again...

 I have contacted the author with regards to the incorrect license file, stay
 tuned.

OK, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2011-11-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||loganje...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-23 17:46:38 EST 
---
I'll take this review.  Thanks for swapping with me.  Now I get to learn what
LV2, MDA, and VST stand for. :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2011-11-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #3 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-11-23 18:14:07 EST 
---
Here are a few preliminary comments.  First, the BuildRoot tag is not necessary
on Fedora.  Second, it appears that README does not need to have its line
endings converted, and neither README nor COPYING need to be converted to
UTF-8.  Third, it looks like the source files are not being compiled with
RPM_OPT_FLAGS.  Is that right?  If I'm reading the docs right, I think you want
to configure like this:

CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir}

Fourth, I'm not familiar with waf.  Is it wise to use the shipped version,
instead of the version in the Fedora waf package?

+: OK
-: must be fixed
=: should be fixed (at your discretion)
N: not applicable

MUST:
[+] rpmlint output:
lv2-mdala-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US phaser -
phase, phrase, phases
lv2-mdala-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reverb -
revere, revers, revert
lv2-mdala-plugins.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
lv2-mdala-plugins-0-svn3580.tar.bz2
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[+] follows package naming guidelines
[+] spec file base name matches package name
[=] package meets the packaging guidelines: with the possible exception of the
RPM_OPT_FLAGS issue noted above
[+] package uses a Fedora approved license
[+] license field matches the actual license
[=] license file is included in %doc: the license file actually included is the
GPL v2 license.  See if upstream will update that to the GPL v3 license text.
[+] spec file is in American English
[+] spec file is legible
[+] sources match upstream
[+] package builds on at least one primary arch (tried x86_64)
[N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch
[+] all build requirements in BuildRequires
[N] spec file handles locales properly
[N] ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] no bundled copies of system libraries
[N] no relocatable packages
[+] package owns all directories that it creates
[+] no files listed twice in %files
[+] proper permissions on files
[+] consistent use of macros
[+] code or permissible content
[N] large documentation in -doc
[+] no runtime dependencies in %doc
[N] header files in -devel
[N] static libraries in -static
[N] .so in -devel
[N] -devel requires main package
[+] package contains no libtool archives
[N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install
[+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
[+] all filenames in UTF-8

SHOULD:
[=] query upstream for license text: see above
[N] description and summary contains available translations
[+] package builds in mock: tried fedora-rawhide-i386
[+] package builds on all supported arches: tried i386 and x86_64
[=] package functions as described: did not test
[+] sane scriptlets
[N] subpackages require the main package
[N] placement of pkgconfig files
[N] file dependencies versus package dependencies
[N] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins

2011-11-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139

--- Comment #1 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-11-14 
23:43:18 EST ---
A minor update

SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins.spec
SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2-mdala-plugins-0-0.2.svn3580.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review