[Bug 757860] Review Request: kgpg - Gpg Gui tool

2011-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757860

--- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert  2011-11-28 
18:18:52 EST ---
Summary could be a little more verbose instead of using 2 abbreviations (out of
3 words). BTW, it should be GPG and GUI (capital letters).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 757860] Review Request: kgpg - Gpg Gui tool

2011-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757860

Christoph Wickert  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert  2011-11-28 
18:14:59 EST ---
REVIEW FOR 55ed39ab549b6cc50d4929d7a4498cc4  kgpg-4.7.80-1.fc16.src.rpm


MUST items

FIX - MUST: rpmlint output: $ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/kgpg-*
kgpg.src:8: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
kgpg.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.7.80/src/kgpg-4.7.80.tar.bz2 
kgpg.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/applications/kde4/kgpg.desktop
kgpg.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kgpg
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.

Source URL needs to be fixed, the rest is ok. The desktop files are executable
on purpose.
The macro-in-comment warning is caused by the  commented out URL line; remove
if it not going to be used anymore.

OK - MUST: package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package in the format %{name}.spec
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+
OK - MUST: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license:
GPLv2+
OK - MUST: source package includes the text of the license in its own file and
that file is included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec file is written in American English
OK - MUST: spec file for the package is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL by
md5 b3731775d46443d429fccd6e0c9eb0d9
OK - MUST: package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
OK - MUST: spec file handles locales properly using %find_lang
N/A - MUST: package (or subpackage) stores shared library files in the dynamic
linker's default paths and call ldconfig in %post and %postun
OK - MUST: package does not bundle copies of system libraries
OK - MUST: package is not designed to be relocatable
OK - MUST: package owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings
OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly
OK - MUST: package consistently use macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: header files are in -devel package
N/A - MUST: static libraries are in -static package
N/A - MUST: library files with a suffix are in -devel package
N/A - MUST: -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
OK - MUST: package does not contain any .la libtool archives
OK - MUST: package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop
file that is properly validated with desktop-file-validate
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages
OK - MUST: all filenames in the package are valid UTF-8


SHOULD items

N/A - SHOULD: source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, query upstream to include it
N/A - SHOULD: description and summary sections should contain translations for
supported Non-English languages, if available
OK - SHOULD: package builds in mock
OK - SHOULD: package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures
OK - SHOULD: package functions as described
OK - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane
N/A - SHOULD: subpackages other than devel require the base package using a
fully versioned dependency
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files are in -devel package
OK - SHOULD: package has no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin
N/A - SHOULD: package contains man pages for binaries/scripts


OTHER items

OK - latest (un)stable version packaged
FIX - source URL is invalid: 'stable' should be 'unstable'
OK - compiler flags ok
OK - debuginfo complete
N/A - package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) files and has 'Requires: pkgconfig'.


ISSUES

- Fix Soure0 URL
- Please add a comment to the Patch, the URL of the bug for upstreaming it or
the URL of the commit where it was applied.
- desktop-file-validate should be in %install not in %check
- package requires dbus-launch, but I am not sure there is an indirect
dependency on dbus-x11 already. Consider adding a direct one.


NOTES

- %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} is the same as %setup -q
- co

[Bug 757860] Review Request: kgpg - Gpg Gui tool

2011-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757860

Christoph Wickert  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert  2011-11-28 
16:04:35 EST ---
I'll review this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 757860] Review Request: kgpg - Gpg Gui tool

2011-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757860

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||656997(kde-reviews)
  Alias||kgpg

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review