[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  2012-01-05 10:32:52 EST ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[!]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[!]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[?]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/758211/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.62.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package : 2ae291030c52999b5672b2a502eab195
  MD5SUM upstream package : 2ae291030c52999b5672b2a502eab195

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[!]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
 include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
 /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[-]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
 upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[!]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
TODO: The following BRs are not essential at the moment, however it might
change some time in the future.  Please, add them: perl(ExtUtils::Installed),
perl(File::Find), perl(File::Spec), perl(GetOpt::Long), and perl(File::Temp).
TODO: The following BRs are needed for the package to build in f17 mock/koji. 
Those were originally bundled:  perl(CPAN::Meta) and perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta)

Generated by fedora-review 0.1.1
External plugins:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  2012-01-06 03:21:13 EST ---
> TODO: The following BRs are not essential at the moment, however it might
> change some time in the future.  Please, add them: perl(ExtUtils::Installed),
Already presents on line 20.

> perl(File::Find),
Done.

> perl(File::Spec),
Already presents on line 11.

> perl(GetOpt::Long),
Why? I cannot find any occurrence of this module in the sources.

> and perl(File::Temp).
Done.

> TODO: The following BRs are needed for the package to build in f17 mock/koji. 
> Those were originally bundled:  perl(CPAN::Meta)
Done

> and perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta)
Done.

In addition, I've appended perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) to BuildRequires to proceed
optional t/xs.t test.

Updated spec and SRPM files are located on the same place.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata  2012-01-06 03:38:40 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > TODO: The following BRs are not essential at the moment, however it might
> > change some time in the future.  Please, add them: 
> > perl(ExtUtils::Installed),
> Already presents on line 20.
> 

This was a typo, I meant ExtUtils::Install (in addition to Installed)

> > perl(File::Find),
> Done.

OK

> 
> > perl(File::Spec),
> Already presents on line 11.

True.


> 
> > perl(GetOpt::Long),
> Why? I cannot find any occurrence of this module in the sources.

./lib/ExtUtils/Command/MM.pm

> 
> > and perl(File::Temp).
> Done.

OK

> 
> > TODO: The following BRs are needed for the package to build in f17 
> > mock/koji. 
> > Those were originally bundled:  perl(CPAN::Meta)
> Done

OK

> 
> > and perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta)
> Done.

OK

> 
> In addition, I've appended perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) to BuildRequires to 
> proceed
> optional t/xs.t test.
> 
> Updated spec and SRPM files are located on the same place.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  2012-01-06 05:06:18 EST ---
> This was a typo, I meant ExtUtils::Install (in addition to Installed)
I add it into build-time and run-time dependencies.

> > > perl(GetOpt::Long),
> > Why? I cannot find any occurrence of this module in the sources.
> > ./lib/ExtUtils/Command/MM.pm
I see, Getopt::Long. I added it into run-time dependencies too.

New package published on the same address.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata  2012-01-06 05:15:04 EST ---
Looks good now, approving.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar  2012-01-06 05:53:49 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker 
Short Description: Create a module Makefile
Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata
Branches: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  2012-01-06 09:21:17 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 758211] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Create a module Makefile

2012-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758211

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.6
   ||2-1.fc17
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-01-06 10:03:04

--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar  2012-01-06 10:03:04 EST ---
Thank you for the (very important) review and the repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review