[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2013-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.fc16   |gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.el6

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  
2012-02-15 15:00:01 EST ---
gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.fc16
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  
2012-01-27 22:27:35 EST ---
gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  
2012-01-19 04:10:28 EST ---
gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  2012-01-18 
17:21:42 EST ---
gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-4.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

adev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-01-18 05:19:17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla  2012-01-17 20:34:26 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

adev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #7 from adev  2012-01-17 16:30:05 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: gridftp-ifce
Short Description: GridFTP library for FTS and lcgutil
Owners: adev
Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

Pierre-YvesChibon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon  2012-01-16 09:18:32 
EST ---
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
  MD5SUM this package : 37be2388451d85676eb49a148731e362
  MD5SUM upstream package : 37be2388451d85676eb49a148731e362


I guess this looks all good :)

This package is therefore APPROVED.

You will be able to continue the process of integrating it in Fedora repository
once you have been approved in the packager group.

However, I will finish the review of your other two submissions before doing
so.

Information regarding your next steps is available at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #5 from adev  2012-01-15 17:53:52 EST ---
Spec URL : http://firwen.org/home/specs/gridftp-ifce.spec
SRPM URL : http://firwen.org/home/specs/gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-3.src.rpm

rpmlint  
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


Koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3702540


[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Invalid buildroot found: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}

   -> corrected 

[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.

  -> done with the %{_docdir} macro

Also, seems you seem to be close to upstream, I would strongly encourage him to
actually do tarball release.

  -> done

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon  2012-01-15 06:58:28 
EST ---

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated

 C/C++ 
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Invalid buildroot found: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint gridftp-ifce-devel-2.1.3-2.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint gridftp-ifce-debuginfo-2.1.3-2.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-2.src.rpm
gridftp-ifce.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lcgutil -> guiltily
gridftp-ifce.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US globus -> globs,
globes, glob's
gridftp-ifce.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gridftp-ifce-2.1.3.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-2.i686.rpm
gridftp-ifce.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lcgutil -> guiltily
gridftp-ifce.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US globus -> globs,
globes, glob's
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
 include it.
[!]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
 /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[-]: SHOULD Package 

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #3 from adev  2012-01-11 08:55:44 EST ---
Update : 
- correct doc directory
- update description
- create separated svn branch


Spec URL : http://firwen.org/home/specs/gridftp-ifce.spec
SRPM URL : http://firwen.org/home/specs/gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-2.src.rpm

rpmlint :
gridftp-ifce.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gridftp-ifce-2.1.3.tar.gz
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


Koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3638933

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

Pierre-YvesChibon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pin...@pingoured.fr
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

--- Comment #2 from adev  2011-12-16 11:25:57 EST ---
I have updated the spec/SRPMS with following your recommendations :

- version number is now 2.1.3, the old one was a mistake
- the useless dependencies are drop, and the isa macro on buildreq too.
- %configure is now used
- the documentation is now in %_docdir
- disable-static is remove, the operation is done manually.
- internal dependencies are corrected.

Spec URL : https://firwen.org/redmine/data/docs/specs/gridftp-ifce.spec
SRPM URL:
https://firwen.org/redmine/data/docs/specs/gridftp-ifce-2.1.3-1.src.rpm

rpmlint : gridftp-ifce.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gridftp-ifce-2.1.3.tar.gz
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

Mohamed El Morabity  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity  2011-12-16 
08:31:32 EST ---
What is the real version of your sources? I can't find in the SVN repo a tag
corresponding to the 2.99.99. Nothing in the commit logs too.
I suppose this package is a version 3 prerelease of gridftp-ice. So please
consider the guidelines concerning prerelease versionning:
  
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release

automake is already required by libtool, and globus-ftp-client-devel by
globus-gass-copy-devel. So you can remove automake and globus-ftp-client-devel
from the BuildRequires.

About the %{_isa} macro and the documentation installation, same remarks than
in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768174

You'd better use the %{configure} macro in %build instead of calling
explicitely the script ./configure. The macro already sets the «
--prefix=%{_prefix} » and « --libdir=%{_libdir} » options. By the way, you can
also remove the « --enable-debug » and « --enable-wall » options, since the
macro already sets the CFLAGS to the default ones expected by the Fedora
Project: these flags already contains the -g and -Wall options.
The --disable-static option doesn't seem to work since a static library is
build anyway. Unless you can fix it, you should remove this option to
configure.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 768310] Review Request: gridftp-ifce - GridFTP abstraction layer for wlcg.

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768310

adev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac
   ||/lcgutil/wiki
 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Summary|Review Request:  -|abstraction layer for wlcg.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review