[Bug 781624] Review Request: opa - Opa, AGPL language for web 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781624 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-02 04:42:44 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 786634 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781624] Review Request: opa - Opa, AGPL language for web 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781624 Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sd...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com 2012-02-01 11:21:31 EST --- Rudy, I will sponsor you, however, I require the sponsored person to be an actual person rather then a packackage_maintainer. The rationale behind this is that any old person could come in and maintain the package. When I sponsor someone, I sponsor only 1 person behind that identifier, not a collection of people. So if you can make yourself a fedora account with your proper name, close this bug, and open a new bug (you can link this bug as well if you like) with the proper login, we can proceed. Unfortunately there isn't a way to change the reporter of the bug in bugzilla. As part of our import process, release engineering and the tools validate that the reporter matches the scm request. Please send me a note (sd...@redhat.com) when you have moved through these steps. Regards -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781624] Review Request: opa - Opa, AGPL language for web 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781624 package.maintai...@opalang.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-02-01 18:54:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781624] Review Request: opa - Opa, AGPL language for web 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781624 --- Comment #2 from package.maintai...@opalang.org 2012-01-24 09:21:53 EST --- Hi, thank you for trying. My apologies, there was problems with the previous hosting service so I used our own servers to host the files this time: Spec URL: http://download.opalang.org/fedora-package-candidate/opa.spec Source: http://download.opalang.org/fedora-package-candidate/opalang.tar.gz SRPM URL: http://download.opalang.org/fedora-package-candidate/opa-0.9.0-1.fc17.src.rpm RPM URL: http://download.opalang.org/fedora-package-candidate/opa-0.9.0-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm The binary package is working fine on x86_64 and I did not test on x86. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781624] Review Request: opa - Opa, AGPL language for web 2.0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781624 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Summary|Review Request: opa - Opa, |Review Request: opa - Opa, |AGPL language for web 2.0, |AGPL language for web 2.0 |first submission, need | |sponsor | --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2012-01-18 16:46:57 EST --- I can't download the spec, as my IP seems to be already in use there (wtf??). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
