[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Steven Dake changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sd...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sd...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Steven Dake changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #1 from Steven Dake 2012-01-16 16:32:34 EST --- BuildRoot is no longer required in fedora packages. It is defined by the build system. clean section is no longer required in fedora packages. clean happens automatically in fedora build system. Fedora packages should not use ExclusiveArch unless the package absolutely won't build on other architectures -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #2 from Steven Dake 2012-01-16 16:39:40 EST --- BLOCKER: rpmbuild -ba dlm.spec fails: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1 + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Processing files: dlm-3.9.0-1.fc16.x86_64 error: File not found: /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dlm-3.9.0-1.fc16.x86_64/lib/systemd/system/dlm.service RPM build errors: File not found: /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dlm-3.9.0-1.fc16.x86_64/lib/systemd/system/dlm.service dlm.service is in the dlm_controld directory but I don't see how the Makefile installs the package. I'd also encourage you if you do a new release to include a LICENSE file in the top level working directory and place it in the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #3 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-16 17:16:48 EST --- new spec and src in same places should fix those -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Steven Dake changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #4 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-17 10:32:23 EST --- fixed a few more things, rpmbuild -ba now works for me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220
--- Comment #5 from Steven Dake 2012-01-17 11:08:58 EST ---
When updating packages please bump the version release number and post new
links so an upgrade works properly.
[FAIL] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the
build produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
[sdake@beast SRPMS]$ rpmlint dlm-3.9.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
dlm.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C cluster infrastructure for dlm
(distributed lock manager)
dlm.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C dlm
dlm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userland -> user land,
user-land, slanderous
dlm.src: W: invalid-license GPLv2, GPLv2+, LGPLv2+
dlm.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/l/dlm/dlm-3.9.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
Recommend capitalizing summary
Recommend changing userland to user land
Recommend changing license to "GPLv2+" (this covers v2)
Recommend making source code available
[sdake@beast x86_64]$ rpmlint dlm-3.9.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
dlm.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C cluster infrastructure for dlm
(distributed lock manager)
dlm.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C dlm
dlm.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userland -> user land,
user-land, slanderous
dlm.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv2, GPLv2+, LGPLv2+
dlm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /lib/systemd/system/dlm.service
dlm.x86_64: E: postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm
dlm.x86_64: E: preun-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm
dlm.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm
dlm.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm
dlm.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 5 warnings.
Recommend capitalizing Cluster
Recommend changing userland to user land
Recommend changing license to GPLV2+
/etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm should not be shipped in new fedora packages
/etc/rc.d/init.d/dlm conflicts with /lib/systemd/system/dlm.service
chkconfig warnings can be ignored
looks like rpmlint needs fixing for systemd
[root@beast x86_64]# rpmlint dlm-debuginfo
dlm-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv2, GPLv2+, LGPLv2+
dlm-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/dlm-3.9.0/dlm_controld/rbtree.c
dlm-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/dlm-3.9.0/dlm_controld/rbtree.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
Correct the mailing address of rbtree.h
[root@beast x86_64]# rpmlint dlm-devel-3.9.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
dlm-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on dlm/dlm-libs/libdlm
dlm-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv2, GPLv2+, LGPLv2+
dlm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
what originates dlm/dlm-libs/libdlm?
Change license to GPLv2+
ignore no documentation warning
I highly recommend requesting upstream (you?) to include a license file (IE put
in COPYING in the tarball) and include it in all of the RPMS as a %doc section.
[PASS] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines .
[PASS] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
[FAIL] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Multiple issues found with rpmlint. init.d scripts included in new fedora
packages is highly discouraged. Conflict with init.d and systemd needs
resolution. Once those are addressed the package would meet guidelines.
[PASS] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines .
[PASS] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
[PASS] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
Please request upstream to include a license file in the package. Ideally all
fedora packages should ship the license as a file in every rpm.
[PASS] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[PASS] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[FAIL] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Sources are not upstream.
[PASS] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture. [7]
builds on x86_64 architecture
[N/A] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each a
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220
--- Comment #6 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-18 13:47:39 EST
---
more changes, rpmlint now tells me:
dlm.src: W: invalid-license GPLv2, GPLv2+, LGPLv2+
That's the license, take it or leave it.
dlm.src:35: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/lib/systemd/systemd-dlm
dlm.src:58: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/systemd/systemd-dlm
This is the only way I found to do this (%{_lib} is not correct here AFAICT)
dlm.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/l/dlm/dlm-3.9.0.tar.gz
Will upload once final.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #7 from Steven Dake 2012-01-18 14:36:39 EST --- post an updated spec and rpm and I'll have a look at the changes. Regards -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #8 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-18 14:50:27 EST --- http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm.spec http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm-3.9.0-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #9 from Steven Dake 2012-01-19 17:06:24 EST --- tibbs pointed me at this link re the spec file license: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220
--- Comment #10 from Steven Dake 2012-01-23 14:33:38 EST ---
Rather then just changing the spec file, can you build a new SRPM? Make sure
to bump
the Release field (ie: 1%{?dist} to 2%{?dist} and edit the changelog.
Change the BuildRequires for corosync to:
BuildRequires: corosync >= 1.99.0
Since this requires the corosync 1.99.0 headers to build, I can't approve this
package until corosync alpha is in rawhide (or the dlm package won't build and
trigger a bunch of spam email). Honza will be putting it in shortly.
[root@beast SRPMS]# rpmlint dlm*src.rpm
dlm.src:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/lib/systemd/systemd-dlm
dlm.src:59: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/systemd/systemd-dlm
dlm.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/d/l/dlm/dlm-3.9.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
/lib/systemd/systemd-dlm seems invalid to me. It is an init script. Init
scripts are not needed in fedora 16+. /lib/systemd binaries are meant as
support binaries for the systemd package. This is why there are E returns for
the lib/systemd definition.
The source must be posted and have an upstream before it can be merged into
fedora.
The following things are currently in the FAIL state:
1. systemd-dlm should be removed (does this help the software function?)
2. no upstream sources
3. the sources in the src.rpm must match the upstream sources
4. The BuildRequires is commented out, blocking merging of the package
This package depends on the corosync alpha package, which hasn't been merged.
Please address the other issues, post a new spec and srpm, and I'll finish the
review. Then when Honza merges the new corosync, I can approve.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #11 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-23 15:13:04 EST --- > BuildRequires: corosync >= 1.99.0 ok > 1. systemd-dlm should be removed (does this help the software function?) This is how I was told to use init scripts with systemd (until I have the time to develop an equivalent script-less method.) None of the other comments can be done until there's a real release and build to do... which I'll do once it's approved, and once a corosync package exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #12 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-24 14:13:43 EST --- I've done a final release, location in new spec file. I've switched to standard service file, the missing bits from the init file can be someone else's problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #13 from Dave Teigland 2012-01-26 13:53:03 EST --- http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm.spec http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm-3.99.0-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #15 from Steven Dake 2012-01-26 14:05:33 EST --- Created attachment 557729 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=557729 patch to change spaces to tabs in header -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #14 from Steven Dake 2012-01-26 14:03:49 EST --- The first section uses mixed tabs and spaces. I've attached a patch to fix. Please integrate that patch to the spec file. with patch: [root@beast SRPMS]# rpmlint dlm-3.99.0-1.fc16.src.rpm dlm.src:3: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [root@beast x86_64]# rpmlint dlm-3.99.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root@beast x86_64]# rpmlint dlm-debuginfo-3.99.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root@beast x86_64]# rpmlint dlm-devel-3.99.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm dlm-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on dlm/dlm-libs/libdlm dlm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [root@beast x86_64]# rpmlint dlm-lib-3.99.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm dlm-lib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userland -> user land, user-land, slanderous dlm-lib.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I would recommend changing userland to "user-land" or "user land" Please put README.license in a %doc of the files section of dlm-devel [PASS] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [root@beast SPECS]# wget http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz --2012-01-26 11:59:04-- http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz Resolving people.redhat.com... 10.5.19.30 Connecting to people.redhat.com|10.5.19.30|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 95490 (93K) [application/x-gzip] Saving to: “dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz” 100%[==>] 95,490 148K/s in 0.6s 2012-01-26 11:59:05 (148 KB/s) - “dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz” saved [95490/95490] [root@beast SPECS]# sha256sum dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz 2c21065a6eac6a2ce24b3121aab0e9cf2dfce7ed15133b34ffdc0d98e2af47d5 dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz [root@beast SOURCES]# sha256sum dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz 2c21065a6eac6a2ce24b3121aab0e9cf2dfce7ed15133b34ffdc0d98e2af47d5 dlm-3.99.0.tar.gz To address before fedora-review+: include readme.license in the %doc section of the devel package apply patch to spec file to fix tabs/spaces issue in the header -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Steven Dake changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Steven Dake 2012-01-27 13:15:09 EST --- Package APPROVED. Fabio, Dave updated the remaining issues and updated the rpm in place. Since he is on PTO for a couple weeks, can you take care of submitting the SCM request and executing the cluster stack transition at your leisure? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2012-01-30 03:02:57 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dlm Short Description: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager) Owners: teigland fabbione Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-30 08:29:27 EST --- teigland is not a valid packager member. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Steven Dake changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #19 from Steven Dake 2012-01-30 08:46:56 EST --- Jon, I am sponsoring teigland through this bugzilla. I had failed to add him to the appropriate group. This should be resolved now. Apologies for the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #21 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2012-01-30 08:53:19 EST --- resubmitting the SCM request... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2012-01-30 08:53:00 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dlm Short Description: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager) Owners: teigland fabbione Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-30 10:37:31 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Excellent, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782220] Review Request: dlm - cluster infrastructure for dlm (distributed lock manager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782220 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-02-01 02:31:36 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
