[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.f |ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.f
   |c17 |c16

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-17 
19:40:31 EDT ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.f |ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.f
   |c16 |c15

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-17 19:59:19 EDT ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.f
   ||c17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-03-16 17:21:47

Bug 784802 depends on bug 784799, which changed state.

Bug 784799 Summary: Review Request: ghc-monad-control - Lift control operations 
through monad transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784799

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution||ERRATA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-16 
17:21:47 EDT ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 
21:23:53 EST ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 
21:24:14 EST ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 
21:24:05 EST ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-07 
02:20:04 EST ---
ghc-lifted-base-0.1.0.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2012-03-06 02:16:53 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||maths...@gmail.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maths...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2012-03-04 10:57:07 EST ---
Taking.

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.

Uses ghc_arches

[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/784802/lifted-base-0.1.0.3.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package : a66af2f8440ca65997440343102f8a8c
  MD5SUM upstream package : a66af2f8440ca65997440343102f8a8c

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
 include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
 /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
 upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2012-03-04 21:26:33 EST 
---
Thanks for reviewing


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: ghc-lifted-base
Short Description: Lifted IO operations from the base library
Owners: petersen
Branches: f17 f16 f15 el6
InitialCC: haskell-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||788159

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||ghc-lifted-base

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 784802] Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library

2012-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-haskell-list@redhat.
   ||com
 Blocks||662259(git-annex)
 Depends on||784799(ghc-monad-control)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review