[Bug 787517] Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX

2012-11-25 Thread bugzilla 
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787517

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2012-11-25 10:21:49

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787517] Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX

2012-11-15 Thread bugzilla 
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787517

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co |nob...@fedoraproject.org
   |m   |
  Alias||dawati-artwork

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787517] Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX

2012-10-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787517

--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann  ---
Just a reminder, sent out once a month ... as usual.

If you are no longer interested in to work on this package, please let us know.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787517] Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX

2012-09-20 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787517

--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann  ---
Just a reminder...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787517] Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX

2012-08-29 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787517

--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann  ---
Any progress with solving the mentioned problems?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 787517] Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX

2012-08-05 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787517

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann  ---
Successful scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4361345

Some initial comments:

The source file headers of the gtk engine contain the GPLv2, please add it to
the license declaration of your package.

Drop libtool from BuildRequires, because it is needed by gnome-common anyway.

%defattr is only needed if you want to provide your package for EPEL <6.


Wouldn't it be better to provide the gtk engine in a separate package,
including the gtk2 themes? The other stuff could also go into a noarch
subpackage. Moreover, I'm unsure if dawati-backgrounds.xml needs an extra
runtime requirement. For now, the binary package needs the following:

libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)  
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)  
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)  
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)  
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)  
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

I'm missing metacity here. Maybe the package should be split into even more
subpackages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review