[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-30 14:05:39 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-30 14:07:02 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc
   ||18
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-03-30 14:08:25

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-26 14:00:02 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-26 14:00:56 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-25 23:56:18 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-26 00:00:35 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 
2012-03-21 14:56:00 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.06-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||803057

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 09:37:57 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated


 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Invalid buildroot found:
 %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
[-]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
 (FSF address)
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/802377/Env-Sanctify-1.04.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package : 304b28041d75f64da4551e4db238d354
  MD5SUM upstream package : 304b28041d75f64da4551e4db238d354
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
 (Patched)
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
 include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
 /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
 upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
 (It's obvious)
[x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[-]: SHOULD Spec use 

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2012-03-12 10:11:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 TODO: There are some missing build dependencies (required by bundled
 Module::Install), namely base, Cwd, File::Path, and File::Spec.  The package
 builds without them at the moment, though.

Added in -2.

 NOTE: I guess you're going to maintain EPEL branches as well so the usual
 BuildRoot/%defattr/%clean stuff is okay.

Indeed, although since EL-4 is now EOL I'm leaving out %defattr as that's not
been needed since before rpm version 4.4.

 TODO: Incorrent FSF address in the licence. Notify upstream, please.

Done: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=75714

 No blockers.  Approving.

Thanks Petr.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2012-03-12 10:13:10 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Env-Sanctify
Short Description: Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Owners: pghmcfc
Branches: EL-5 EL-6 F-15 F-16 F-17
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 10:16:50 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 
11:15:00 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 
11:14:48 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc15

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 
11:14:03 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 
11:14:17 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc16

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV

2012-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 
11:15:12 EDT ---
perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review