[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-06-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-06-25 20:53:53

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-wai-1.2.0.2-1.fc17, ghc-warp-1.2.1.1-1.fc17, ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-1.fc17,
ghc-snap-core-0.8.1-1.fc17, ghc-zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1-1.fc17,
ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.2.1-1.fc17, ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.3-1.fc17,
ghc-zlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package ghc-wai-1.2.0.2-1.fc17, ghc-warp-1.2.1.1-1.fc17,
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-1.fc17, ghc-snap-core-0.8.1-1.fc17,
ghc-zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1-1.fc17, ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.2.1-1.fc17,
ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.3-1.fc17, ghc-zlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-1.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-wai-1.2.0.2-1.fc17
ghc-warp-1.2.1.1-1.fc17 ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-1.fc17 ghc-snap-core-0.8.1-1.fc17
ghc-zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1-1.fc17 ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.2.1-1.fc17
ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.3-1.fc17 ghc-zlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-1.fc17'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9375/ghc-wai-1.2.0.2-1.fc17,ghc-warp-1.2.1.1-1.fc17,ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-1.fc17,ghc-snap-core-0.8.1-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.2.1-1.fc17,ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.3-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-1.fc17
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-06-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-wai-1.2.0.2-1.fc17,ghc-warp-1.2.1.1-1.fc17,ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-1.fc17,ghc-snap-core-0.8.1-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.2.1-1.fc17,ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.3-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-1.fc17
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-wai-1.2.0.2-1.fc17,ghc-warp-1.2.1.1-1.fc17,ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-1.fc17,ghc-snap-core-0.8.1-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-enum-0.2.2.1-1.fc17,ghc-simple-sendfile-0.2.3-1.fc17,ghc-zlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-1.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||ghc-zlib-conduit

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-05-15 08:17:11 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2012-05-15 21:30:20 EDT 
---
Built for F18 rawhide.

F17 and earlier need newer zlib-bindings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||805887

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2012-05-14 20:22:50 EDT ---

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[?]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/boeckb/misc/code/review/817984/zlib-conduit-0.4.0.1.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package : a142c41a2b8a90947ce8c0ac9ac7307e
  MD5SUM upstream package : a142c41a2b8a90947ce8c0ac9ac7307e

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
 include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
 /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
 upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.


Generated by fedora-review 0.1.3
External plugins:

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving 

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard|Ready   |
   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2012-05-14 23:31:51 EDT 
---
Thanks for the review.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: ghc-zlib-conduit
Short Description: Conduits for compression
Owners: petersen
Branches: f17 f16 f15 el6
InitialCC: haskell-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maths...@gmail.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Status Whiteboard||Ready

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression

2012-05-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984

Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||759428

--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2012-05-01 21:14:57 EDT 
---
http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/zlib-conduit

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review