[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #17 from Igor Gnatenko --- I've submitted new review request *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1170529 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-12-31 04:22:48 --- Comment #16 from Sebastien Caps --- Since I still lack of sponsor and I have no more time to spend on it, I close it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MHpuBhdz0n&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #15 from Sebastien Caps --- Based on new comments from Greg Swift I fix %ifs block. SPEC: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012103102/reprepro.spec SRPM: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012103102/reprepro-4.12.3-6.fc16.src.rpm F18 Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4643439 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #14 from Sebastien Caps --- upstream reply for sha256 fc18 warnings: *** sha256.c:192:3: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] sha256.c:193:3: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] Those should be harmless. If you want to be sure, you can cherry-pick commit 2688a890 (http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=mirrorer/reprepro.git;a=commit;h=2688a890). *** So I put this patch in the last version: SRPM: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/20121031/reprepro-4.12.3-5.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/20121031/reprepro.spec F18 Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4642198 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #13 from Sebastien Caps --- fixed missing bzip2-devel and libarchive-devel build dependencies put %deffattr for el6 in %files fixed fc17 & fc18 sha256 problem: Now using openssl md5 and sha for md5 and sha256. For sha1 I keep using bundled library since it have some differences sha1.count in the class ->I will publish the patch upstream asap and try to find a way to fix in future release. SRPM: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/20121030/reprepro-4.12.3-4.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/20121030/reprepro.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gregsw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Greg Swift ---
I had the need to build a debian repo on my rhel environment today and found
this so I went to build the latest version of the SPEC (I included the bzip2
and removed the RPM_OPT_FLAGS).
Upon initial --rebuild of srpm on my centos6 box:
$ rpmbuild --rebuild -ba srpms/reprepro-4.12.3-3.fc16.src.rpm
Installing srpms/reprepro-4.12.3-3.fc16.src.rpm
warning: user caps does not exist - using root
warning: group caps does not exist - using root
warning: user caps does not exist - using root
warning: group caps does not exist - using root
error: Failed build dependencies:
libdb-devel is needed by reprepro-4.12.3-3.el6.x86_64
so:
1: If you're planning on supporting rhel as well you might wrap the db-devel
Build requires in a conditional block? Considering rhel6 will probably be the
last to have it I'd do something like:
%if 0%{?rhel} <= 6
BuildRequires: db4-devel
%else
BuildRequires: libdb-devel
%endif
2: (for someone aside from sebastien) Now that defattr doesn't get defined, we
get those user errors over in rhel land... should that also be wrapped in a
conditional block if you want to support both?
I also did not see the sha256 warnings mentioned in comment 10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #11 from Sebastien Caps --- 1. For bz2 I don't know, here it is mentioned to not include bzip2 not sure about bzip2-devel should I add it ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 2. ok removed 3. I don't have theses warning under FC16 I will try to fix it thx. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius ---
3 remarks:
1. Any particular reasons why you are building without bz2-support?
From your build.log:
...
checking for BZ2_bzCompressInit in -lbz2... no
configure: WARNING: "no libbz2 found, compiling without"
...
If not, you likely are missing a BuildRequires: bzip2-devel
2. Your spec contains this:
make %{?_smp_mflags} RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
The "RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is meaningless (and therefore bogus).
Please remove it.
3. The code bundles copies of md5.*, sha1.*, sha256.*.
Very "interesting" about these bundled versions is this pretty serious warning
compilation of sha256.c raises:
sha256.c: In function 'SHA256Final':
sha256.c:192:3: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing]
sha256.c:193:3: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter --- Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #8 from Sebastien Caps --- Yes, I still looking for a sponsor. Fedora Account System Username: virer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter --- Are you still looking for a sponsor? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #6 from Sebastien Caps --- Fedora 18 removed db4-devel package, switching to libdb-devel build dependence SPEC: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012083009/reprepro.spec SRPM: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012083009/reprepro-4.12.3-3.fc16.src.rpm F18 Build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4436849 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #5 from Sebastien Caps --- Fix spec file to follow %clean %buildroot guidelines SRPMS: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012081417/reprepro-4.12.3-2.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012081417/reprepro.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #4 from Sebastien Caps --- $ rpmlint ./reprepro.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New SPEC: http://virer.net/repo/raw/reprepro.spec New SRPM: http://virer.net/repo/raw/reprepro-4.12.3-1.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Some additional comments to those from Cédric. - The latest release is 4.12.3 - Isn't openssl and gpgme picked automatically by rpm? Already mentioned in Comment 5 of 624023 - man pages doesn't need to be marked as %doc - %defattr doesn't follow the Fedora guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kana...@kanarip.com --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- *** Bug 624023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Cédric OLIVIER changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cedric.oliv...@free.fr --- Comment #1 from Cédric OLIVIER --- rpmlint gave warnings on SRPM : reprepro.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) debian -> Debian reprepro.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C tool to handle local repositories of debian packages. reprepro.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C tool to handle local repositories of debian packages. reprepro.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US udeb -> deb, u deb reprepro.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US indices -> induces, indies, indicts reprepro.src:6: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Sebastien Don't set "Packager". It should be removed, so as to use rebuilder's own defaults. Your name appears in the %changelog reprepro.src:4: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 1) You must use uniform spacing and or tabs in your spec file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828188] Review Request: reprepro - Debian package repository producer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188 Sebastien Caps changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|reprepro - Debian package |Review Request: reprepro - |repository producer |Debian package repository ||producer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
