[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JJ5RdctuJya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs New Branches: el5 Owners: ansilva siwinski InitialCC: Adding el5 branch to follow most other drupal6 packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zTy5yWPZIKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-08-24 23:03:52 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com --- [10:01 AM] [0]whearn@Pluto:/var/lib/mock/fedora-16-x86_64/result $ rpmlint drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs-2.0.rc1-3.fc16.* drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parametrized - parametric drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parametrized - parametric 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [10:10 AM] [0]whearn@Pluto:~/rpmbuild/SOURCES $ curl http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/custom_breadcrumbs-6.x-2.0-rc1.tar.gz | sha256sum % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed 100 54931 100 549310 0 100k 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 138k 4530f86f407e776033e156dffcd6c7ecffd86470f03825048c0b7a78ed30549c - [10:10 AM] [0]whearn@Pluto:~/rpmbuild/SOURCES $ sha256sum custom_breadcrumbs-6.x-2.0-rc1.tar.gz 4530f86f407e776033e156dffcd6c7ecffd86470f03825048c0b7a78ed30549c custom_breadcrumbs-6.x-2.0-rc1.tar.gz [O] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. [O] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [O] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . [O] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [O] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [O] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [O] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [O] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [O] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [O] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [O] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [O] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [O] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [O] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [O] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [O] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [O] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [O] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [O] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) [O] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [O] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [O] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [O] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [O] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [O]
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Anderson Silva ansi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs Short Description: Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6 Owners: afsilva Branches: f17 el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828501] Review Request: drupal6-custom_breadcrumbs - Custom Breadcrumbs Module for Drupal6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828501 Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||whe...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|whe...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review