[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-08-17 21:22:08

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
codenarc-0.17-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
codenarc-0.17-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mgold...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
I'm taking this for review, but dropping gmaven requirement.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

--- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!]  Rpmlint output:

0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
codenarc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/codenarc-0.17/NOTICE.txt
codenarc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/codenarc-0.17/LICENSE.txt
codenarc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/codenarc-0.17/README.txt
codenarc.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/codenarc-0.17/README.txt
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings

Seee issue #1.

[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x]  Buildroot definition is not present
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: a986ae23279ea0d1e8f5e5d11646f8dd
MD5SUM upstream package: a986ae23279ea0d1e8f5e5d11646f8dd
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[!]  Permissions on files are set properly.

See *.txt issues descrived in #1.

[X]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[!]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage

We cannot generate javadocs because of groovydoc issues. Additionally we cannot
use javadoc task from Ant, because some source is in groovy language and the
javadoc build fails. Onse we'll have gmaven, it;ll be possible to generate 

[-]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x]  Package uses %global not %define
[-]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x]  pom files has correct add_maven_depmap

=== Maven ===
[x]  Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-]  If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-]  If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x]  Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]  Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro

=== Other suggestions ===
[-]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x]  Latest version is packaged.
[x]  Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:

Locally with gmetrics available.

=== Issues ===
1. Please fix the permissions and encoding on *.txt files.
2. Please install the jar into codenarc.jar instead CodeNarc.jar. I don't think
the CodeNarc.jar symlink is required at all.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/codenarc/1/codenarc.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/codenarc/1/codenarc-0.17-2.fc16.src.rpm
- fixed the permissions and encoding issues on *.txt files
- change with_gmaven to 0 (only for now)
- generate javadocs with ant support

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
 Depends On|841833  |
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Looks good now, APPROVED!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: codenarc
Short Description: Groovy library that provides static analysis features for
Groovy code
Owners: gil
Branches: f17
InitialCC: java-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
codenarc-0.17-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codenarc-0.17-2.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mizde...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
I am taking this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|mizde...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review?  |

--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Oops, I didn't notice this review depended on 2 others. Stepping back, sorry.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-07-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||809950

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-07-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844314] Review Request: codenarc - Groovy library that provides static analysis features for Groovy code

2012-07-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844314

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||844299, 841833

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review