[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

MERCIER Jonathan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-10-23 15:32:48

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

MERCIER Jonathan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

MERCIER Jonathan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwout...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
This ticket is not assigned to anyone.  Please fix and re-raise the flag.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

MERCIER Jonathan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #9 from MERCIER Jonathan  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: gl3n
Short Description: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D  
Owners: bioinfornatics
Branches: f17 f18 
InitialCC: bioinfornatics

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

Paul Wouters  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Paul Wouters  ---
APPROVED with these changes

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #7 from MERCIER Jonathan  ---
Done ldc own /usr/include/d 
I will see if gdc come into fedora

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #6 from MERCIER Jonathan  ---
/usr/include/d should be own by ldc the compiler but i look ig gdc ( gcc D
compiler) wiill come into fedora in this case /usr/include/d should not be own
by ldc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #5 from Paul Wouters  ---
I think you might have uploaded the old spec?

eg it does not address the requires for the -devel package on /usr/include/d ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #4 from MERCIER Jonathan  ---
SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/gl3n.spec
SRPM: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/gl3n-0.20120813-3.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #3 from MERCIER Jonathan  ---
I do not know the reason exactly but stripping process do not works with D
shared library.

For this reason is used: %global debug_package %{nil}

That is same for haskell by example

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #2 from Paul Wouters  ---
/usr/lib64/libgl3n-ldc.so.1.0.0: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version
1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
BuildID[sha1]=0x0340c3c46d36d359c53b19d2d0caf9f03ebfa885, not stripped

this also needs fixing, something going wrong with creating the debug package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

--- Comment #1 from Paul Wouters  ---
Note: comments ver ysimilar to glfw.

The version seems better to be 0, as upstream has no versioning whatsoever. It
uses a soname of 1, but we don't know if that signifies a pre or post release
of version 1. I suggest gl3n-0.20120921-1

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 C/C++ 
[x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[ ]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: MUST Package contains no static executables.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
 present.

 Generic 
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[!]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 See pkgconfig and geany and ldc Requires for the -devel package
 Note: I filed rhbz#859492 for /usr/include/d being unowned.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[ ]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 Why is the non-standard (unversioned) {_defaultdocdir}/%{name} used?
 Perhaps after make install, remove those files and use %doc to put these
 in the right place?
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
 found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
 Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5)
 Note: Only applicable for EL-5
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[ ]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[ ]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present
   

[Bug 847794] Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D

2012-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847794

Paul Wouters  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||pwout...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review