https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848087
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4403565
$ rpmlint -i -v *
wmMatrix.src: I: checking
wmMatrix.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xmatrix -> matrix, x matrix,
aviatrix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screensaver -> screen saver,
screen-saver, screens aver
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xscreensaver ->
screenwriter
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.src: I: checking-url http://repo.or.cz/w/dockapps.git (timeout 10
seconds)
wmMatrix.src: I: checking-url
http://repo.or.cz/w/dockapps.git/snapshot/wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
wmMatrix.i686: I: checking
wmMatrix.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xmatrix -> matrix, x matrix,
aviatrix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screensaver -> screen saver,
screen-saver, screens aver
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xscreensaver ->
screenwriter
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.i686: I: checking-url http://repo.or.cz/w/dockapps.git (timeout 10
seconds)
wmMatrix.x86_64: I: checking
wmMatrix.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xmatrix -> matrix, x matrix,
aviatrix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screensaver -> screen saver,
screen-saver, screens aver
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xscreensaver ->
screenwriter
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
wmMatrix.x86_64: I: checking-url http://repo.or.cz/w/dockapps.git (timeout 10
seconds)
wmMatrix-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
wmMatrix-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://repo.or.cz/w/dockapps.git
(timeout 10 seconds)
wmMatrix-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
wmMatrix-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://repo.or.cz/w/dockapps.git
(timeout 10 seconds)
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
Some ignorable spelling errors.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv2+ and BSD
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
870257fae370703bbd01116e2ab83e699e90d6751df4cc653fc783803e2970b4
wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz
2208a26eac9186324396c73cea2c3d12ee098c4316102e5f209710fbda430a62
wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz.orig
The reason for differing checksums is explained in the spec file. However,
the problem is known to me from Github and Googlecode URLs.
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed i
