[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2014-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #7 from Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: geany-themes
New Branches: epel7
Owners: dmaphy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2014-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2014-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209



--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-09-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-09-17 18:54:26

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thanks very much for this quick review Mario! :)


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: geany-themes
Short Description: A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany
Owners: dmaphy
Branches: f17 f18 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
geany-themes-1.22-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848209] Review Request: geany-themes - A collection of syntax highlighting color schemes for Geany

2012-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848209

Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4396522

$ rpmlint -i -v *
geany-themes.src: I: checking
geany-themes.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/codebrainz/geany-themes
(timeout 10 seconds)
geany-themes.src: I: checking-url
https://github.com/downloads/codebrainz/geany-themes/geany-themes-1.22.tar.bz2
(timeout 10 seconds)
geany-themes.noarch: I: checking
geany-themes.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/codebrainz/geany-themes
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

No issues.



-
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[.] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv2 and BSD
[.] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
Although we have a COPYING file, it doesn't contain license info directly.
No license file available for the time being.

[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
sha256sum *
9f9fca73ed8d4fb9e633b8715a8f1885f394101a45a0d3bec2baf2814f4dab1a 
geany-themes-1.22.tar.bz2
9f9fca73ed8d4fb9e633b8715a8f1885f394101a45a0d3bec2baf2814f4dab1a 
geany-themes-1.22.tar.bz2.orig

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[.] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc