[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2013-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Ah, my mistake then.  perl-podlators is just not needed for me.  Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f8osHqFkC7a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2013-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

--- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Even if podlators was subpackaged in RHEL, an EPEL package would be replacing
it, which is against EPEL rules. So I don't think there's any way this can
happen.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zbb44lOAVWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2013-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
I have no objection to you maintaining EPEL6 branch however there is a problem
with dual-living the modules: podlators modules are part of RHEL-6 binary perl
package, there is no perl-podlators sub-package. You cannot simply package
newer versions of the modules because you would get unpredictable yum
resolutions. So I think your request is not doable unless Red Hat sub-packages
podlators in RHEL-6.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CB7EG873mXa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2013-05-01 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com

--- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Petr -  I'd like to see this in EPEL6.  Would you care to maintain it there, or
shall I?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ilZxFE5cBJa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2013-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org

--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Why does perl-podlators have explicit requires for:

perl(Pod::Text::Color)
perl(Pod::Text::Overstrike)
perl(Pod::Text::Termcap)

when it provides these itself?

What is the point of that?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KQAgL0uILRa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2013-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Overwork. I swapped test-time set with run-time set probably.

I will fix it. Thanks for spotting it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kctNDGmmoxa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-podlators-2.4.2-2.fc19

--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for the review and the repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-10-31 04:17:59

--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
perl-podlators removed from perl-5.16.1-241.fc19.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-10-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-10-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
No issues, approving.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-10-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-podlators
Short Description: Format POD source into various output formats
Owners: ppisar, jplesnik, psabata
Branches: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-10-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
perl-podlators files have been sub-packaged in perl-5.16.1-234.fc19.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|826872  |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 856516] Review Request: perl-podlators - Format POD source into various output formats

2012-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856516

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||826872

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review