[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Bug 857137 depends on bug 986172, which changed state. Bug 986172 Summary: Review Request: jackson-databind - General data-binding package for Jackson (2.x) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986172 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XvaFrVQrema=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Bug 857137 depends on bug 986170, which changed state. Bug 986170 Summary: Review Request: jackson-core - Core part of Jackson https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986170 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ynXwIjUqw9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||986172 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MRE8XKzsCTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||986170 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TDiPNVubuia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Bug 857137 depends on bug 857077, which changed state. Bug 857077 Summary: Review Request: jackson2-core - Core part of Jackson https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857077 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0zZ4Opg5d9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Bug 857137 depends on bug 857102, which changed state. Bug 857102 Summary: Review Request: jackson2-databind - General data-binding package for Jackson (2.x) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857102 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yuor1wOtmCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-07-22 08:50:56 --- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- replaced by jackson-module-jaxb-annotations #986175 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jk62p8eHdga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations-2.2.1-1.fc19.src.rpm - update to 2.2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UPOLhEkz5ia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mgold...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PSZTup1Sypa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jackson2
-module-jaxb-annotations-javadoc
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 46 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations Short Description: JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x) Owners: gil Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HOPRr5nPZva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations Short Description: JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x) Owners: gil Branches: f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4ORHAxQbfDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uBdDhBxdjka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4NO1RamVvCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857137] Review Request: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations - JAXB annotations support for Jackson (2.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857137 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |jackson-module-jaxb-annotat |jackson2-module-jaxb-annota |ions - JAXB annotations |tions - JAXB annotations |support for Jackson (2.x) |support for Jackson (2.x) --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson2/jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson2/jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations-2.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm - update to 2.1.0 - renamed jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
