[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-11-14 14:45:42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanommer-0.2.0-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4677580
$ rpmlint -i -v *python-datanommer-consumer.src: I: checking
python-datanommer-consumer.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/datanommer.consumer (timeout 10 seconds)
python-datanommer-consumer.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/datanommer.consumer/datanommer.consumer-0.2.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-datanommer-consumer.noarch: I: checking
python-datanommer-consumer.noarch: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/datanommer.consumer (timeout 10 seconds)
python-datanommer-consumer.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/datanommer.consumer/datanommer.consumer-0.2.0.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Nothing of interest.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv3+
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
34cdcc22a12dba1ac683cf77ce894f59b5bbd9f46ae1c854bb0802a11986
datanommer.consumer-0.2.0.tar.gz
34cdcc22a12dba1ac683cf77ce894f59b5bbd9f46ae1c854bb0802a11986
datanommer.consumer-0.2.0.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-datanommer-consumer Short Description: Hub consumer plugin for datanommer Owners: ralph Branches: f17 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Updates and buildroot overrides have been requested/created for python-datanommer-models which should make building this package easier. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-datanommer-models -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Bug 865536 depends on bug 865535, which changed state. Bug 865535 Summary: Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New release removes Conflicts tag with the old datanommer. Rely on the implicit file conflict instead of an explicit versioned package conflict. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Removed unnecessary CFLAGS definition. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||865535 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Updated release to remove upstream egg-info so that it gets rebuilt. Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
