[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2014-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #22 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Please un-retire the EPEL7 branch. It is retired because zabbix20 is an
EPEL-only package and the master branch was retired to avoid Fedora Rawhide
builds.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2014-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2014-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159



--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
epel7 isn't retired.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2013-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zabbix20-2.0.4-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hc5U3rFvGha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2013-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zabbix20-2.0.4-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zabbix20-2.0.4-4.el5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PJwZrg1TVQa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2013-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #19 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
(In reply to comment #14)
 These seem to be all over the place too:
 
 /etc/zabbix/alertscripts
 /etc/zabbix/externalscripts
 
 /var/lib/zabbixsrv/alertscripts
 /var/lib/zabbixsrv/externalscripts
 
 /var/lib/zabbixsrv/zabbix/alertscripts
 /var/lib/zabbixsrv/zabbix/externalscripts

The latter two are finally sorted out in Rawhide now (2.0.4-4).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bcL4nZRmyja=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2013-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U5tyQI67R4a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2013-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #17 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: zabbix20
New Branches: el5
Owners: volter sharkcz
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ac0GJq6tg9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com

--- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Why does zabbix20-agent have both of these?

/etc/zabbix/zabbix_agent.conf
/etc/zabbix/zabbix_agentd.conf

and

/etc/zabbix_agent.conf
/etc/zabbix_agentd.conf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=quW0rzSHgra=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Same with server:

/etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf
/etc/zabbix_server.conf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mkyIXym7uja=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 Why does zabbix20-agent have both of these?
 
 /etc/zabbix/zabbix_agent.conf
 /etc/zabbix/zabbix_agentd.conf

^^^ these are compatibility symlinks, upstream moved the config files to /etc

 and
 
 /etc/zabbix_agent.conf
 /etc/zabbix_agentd.conf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KXZU401BO2a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
These seem to be all over the place too:

/etc/zabbix/alertscripts
/etc/zabbix/externalscripts

/var/lib/zabbixsrv/alertscripts
/var/lib/zabbixsrv/externalscripts

/var/lib/zabbixsrv/zabbix/alertscripts
/var/lib/zabbixsrv/zabbix/externalscripts

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=B3NsIpfqtGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
 (In reply to comment #11)
  Why does zabbix20-agent have both of these?
  
  /etc/zabbix/zabbix_agent.conf
  /etc/zabbix/zabbix_agentd.conf
 
 ^^^ these are compatibility symlinks, upstream moved the config files to /etc

Ah, sorry, my backup system didn't make this obvious to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HQykMGIKeta=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #16 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
The last pair should not be there. I haven't found the cause yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XziHckLV1ma=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-11-24 15:01:06

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zabbix20-2.0.3-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zabbix20-2.0.3-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zabbix20-2.0.3-4.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zabbix20-2.0.3-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
zabbix20-2.0.3-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zabbix20-2.0.3-3.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review?

--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
[!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
 Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Conflicts


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in %package
 proxy-mysql, %package proxy-sqlite3, %package web-pgsql, %package proxy-
 pgsql, %package web-mysql
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 GPL, GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated, zlib/libpng. 4
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/mrunge/review/867159-zabbix20/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
 Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
 Note: Documentation size is 440320 bytes in 10 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Reguires:.
 Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
 $version)) missing?
[x]: CPAN urls should be 

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Thanks a lot, Matthias!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: zabbix20
Short Description: Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure
Owners: volter sharkcz
Branches: el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-11-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/zabbix20.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/zabbix20-2.0.3-3.fc16.src.rpm

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4627056


- Correct capitalization in unit files, init scripts and package description
- Improve sysconfig sourcing in init scripts
- Correct post-script permissions and owner on rpmnew files
- Obsolete sqlite web and server sub-package

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-10-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||d...@danny.cz

--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
*** Bug 712921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867159] Review Request: zabbix20 - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

2012-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867159

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Package Review  |Package Review
Version|rawhide |el6
Product|Fedora  |Fedora EPEL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review