[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2012-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
* you should set minimal version supported of BR when known (ie: CMake >= 2.6)
* use make instead of cmake wrappers as recommended by CMake guidelines.
In the case of build, it allows to enable/disable quickly parallel builds
* you don't need to specify CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX and CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE (default
is debug and it will be stripped afterwards). As for INSTALL_LIB, it has been
replaced by the more usual INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR in master.
https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/pull/823
You should request that upstream replaces INSTALL_INC by INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR

Note, that %cmake macro sets INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR and LIB_INSTALL_DIR which are
the standard de facto in CMake community.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2012-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Veeti Paananen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||veeti.paana...@rojekti.fi

--- Comment #2 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Hi,

Thanks for the comments. Here's a revised spec:

Spec: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2-2/libgit2.spec
SRPM: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2-2/libgit2-0.17.0-2.fc17.src.rpm

Changelog:

* Fri Oct 19 2012 Veeti Paananen  - 0.17.0-2
- Use make for building and installation
- Specify minimum CMake version
- Remove useless OpenSSL build dependency
- Move development documentation to the -devel package
- Add code examples to the -devel package

Just false spelling errors in rpmlint.

---

> * you should set minimal version supported of BR when known (ie: CMake >= 2.6)

Done

> * use make instead of cmake wrappers as recommended by CMake guidelines.

Done

> * you don't need to specify CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX and CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE 
> (default is debug and it will be stripped afterwards).

Removed prefix since make and make install apparently works after all. Their
CMakeLists forces -O0 if the build type is debug, so CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is
needed.

> You should request that upstream replaces INSTALL_INC by INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR

I'll submit some patches to them to fix the path variables (and possibly the
debug thing) later. They might not apply cleanly to 0.17.0 and the spec since
their development branch is quite far ahead, though, so I think keeping
INSTALL_LIB and INSTALL_INC for now is reasonable.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2012-10-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
There are few bundled libraries:
Not a problem:
* zlib, regex (in deps tree): only used if system's version are unavailable.
Requiring either packaging dependencies or Fesco approval:
* joyent/http_parser (in deps tree): few changes, but it's unclear (to me) if
it can work with upstream version which is actively maintained
(https://github.com/joyent/http-parser) => check with upstream if they support
upstream version, you can get a temporary permission if it can be fixed in
upcoming versions.
* libxdiff (in src tree): unmaintained by libxdiff upstream since 2008, there
are few bugfixes and libgit2 specific changes in history. I assume that
upstream is willing to maintain it as part of libgit2, so i consider that as a
legit bundled library.

You should file a ticket to Fesco on these before approval as explained here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2012-11-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #4 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Hi,

Sorry for the late response.

The libxdiff bundling seems to be somewhat complicated because the libgit2
developers tell me [1] that their copy of xdiff comes from git's source code
[2] and not from libxdiff. Fedora's git package doesn't seem to have any
exception for this "bundling". How do I proceed from here?

I've written a patch to use to the system's instance of http-parser and I'll
post an updated spec once this is clear.

[1] https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/pull/1005
[2] https://github.com/git/git/tree/master/xdiff

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2014-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Veeti Paananen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #29 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: libgit2
New Branches: el5 el6
Owners: vpaan

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959



--- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #12 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Another update to that removes now unnecessary flags from the %cmake macro and
fixes the pkgconfig file.

Spec: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/4/libgit2.spec
SRPM: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/4/libgit2-0.18.0-2.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=diMXF8SljW&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tcall...@redhat.com
 Depends On||969111

--- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
Okay. I've made a merged libxdiff that libgit2 and git can both use.

Here is a patch for libgit2 0.18.0 to use it:
http://spot.fedorapeople.org/libgit2-0.18.0-system-libxdiff.patch

Here is an updated spec that uses it (and nukes src/xdiff):
http://spot.fedorapeople.org/libgit2.spec

libxdiff is waiting for review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969111

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CTl7iQHOld&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #14 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Thanks so much!

I guess this is ready for review now. I recall trying to do a scratch build
with Koji a while back and having it fail on the test suite because there's no
internet connection, so I've disabled the online tests in this new spec:

Spec: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/5/libgit2.spec
SRPM: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/5/libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fTqU4BWjI0&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #15 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
Great news, there should be no more blockers for this review. :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4V2WlR4ohd&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #16 from Haïkel Guémar  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "BSD (2
 clause)". 463 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
 in /home/haikel/867959-libgit2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
 Note: Cannot unpack rpms (using --prebuilt?)
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
 Note: Re-using old build in mock
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq,

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Veeti Paananen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #17 from Veeti Paananen  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libgit2
Short Description: A C implementation of the Git core methods as a library
Owners: vpaan
Branches: f18 f19
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5tfk84Howg&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VyiUd7G54u&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mu3EG8TFTY&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember  ---
Can you import and build it, please?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ktaEiecVhE&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #20 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho)  ---
fyi in a few days they will release 0.19.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gr1bjLy71d&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #21 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Yes, sorry, I've been waiting for 0.19.0. I'll import and build if it doesn't
come out in the next few days.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RmvAfRjETH&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||974834

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V946EK7XbP&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Bug 867959 depends on bug 969111, which changed state.

Bug 969111 Summary: Review Request: libxdiff - Basic functionality to create 
difference/patches in binary and text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969111

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ayJiAPqNZ9&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CyC5tLJoV0&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MozDSkDwNW&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=owK5OxF0re&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgit2-0.18.0-4.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jFkgF75KlC&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UvKdJFchQd&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rt8dqqAJPv&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc19
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-06-29 14:32:50

--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1ireCxhErJ&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc19   |libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc18

--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
libgit2-0.18.0-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mUcFMBTg88&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||i...@gnome.org

--- Comment #5 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho)  ---
This review will block in a near future the one for libgit2-glib.
http://git.gnome.org/browse/libgit2-glib

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YnK3N9RciB&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-02-21 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer  ---
adding myself to CC (I'll need this for Gitorious)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4vc8WU8zdZ&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-04-05 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Troy Dawson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tdaw...@redhat.com

--- Comment #7 from Troy Dawson  ---
*** Bug 927310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L9aa5gwnhv&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #8 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho)  ---
Any news on this? 0.18.0 has been released already

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OXiNjLzirz&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #9 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
i'll finish the review as soon as the bundled libraries issues will be fixed
(upstreamed patch or bundling exceptions etc...)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NejmeGj9nE&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-01 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

Toshio Ernie Kuratomi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||a.bad...@gmail.com

--- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi  ---
/me notes that the urls for srpm and spec file are currently 404.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fSq9N3Wssu&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 867959] Review Request: libgit2 - C library for git

2013-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867959

--- Comment #11 from Veeti Paananen  ---
Sorry about that. I've updated the package for 0.18.0 and added a patch to fix
the http-parser bundling.

Spec: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/3/libgit2.spec
SRPM: http://veetipaananen.fi/files/libgit2/3/libgit2-0.18.0-1.fc18.src.rpm

Now only the xdiff mess needs to be sorted out.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vEfXY6WNgu&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review