[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2014-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2014-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2014-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: sucrack
New Branches: el6 epel7
Owners: fab 
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2012-11-18 21:28:50

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
sucrack-1.2.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
sucrack-1.2.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
sucrack-1.2.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sucrack-1.2.3-1.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
sucrack-1.2.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sucrack-1.2.3-1.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-11-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: sucrack
Short Description: A su cracker
Owners: fab
Branches: f17 f18
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Mario Blättermann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
   ||m
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann  ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
sucrack.src: I: checking
sucrack.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) su -> sew, us, s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded ->
multicolored
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US su -> sew, us, s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins,
lo gins
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.src: I: checking-url http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack.shtml
(timeout 10 seconds)
sucrack.src: I: checking-url
http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack/sucrack-1.2.3.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
sucrack.i686: I: checking
sucrack.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) su -> sew, us, s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded ->
multicolored
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US su -> sew, us, s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins,
lo gins
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.i686: I: checking-url http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack.shtml
(timeout 10 seconds)
sucrack.x86_64: I: checking
sucrack.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) su -> sew, us, s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreaded ->
multicolored
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US su -> sew, us, s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing,
loins, lo gins
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

sucrack.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack.shtml (timeout 10 seconds)
sucrack-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
sucrack-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url
http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack.shtml (timeout 10 seconds)
sucrack-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
sucrack-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url
http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack.shtml (timeout 10 seconds)
sucrack.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.leidecker.info/projects/sucrack/sucrack-1.2.3.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.


No real issues.


-
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-

[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
BSD
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
f0cce09be99e1b3bc04e0d0e36424b61f187d1a6501597a30c7aeaf3bab73bab 
sucrack-1.2.3.tar.gz
f0cce09be99e1b3bc04e0d0e36424b61f187d1a6501597a30c7aeaf3bab73bab 
sucrack-1.2.3.tar.gz.orig

[+] MUST: The package MUST success

[Bug 870725] Review Request: sucrack - A su cracker

2012-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
  Alias||sucrack

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review