[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2012-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Alon Bar-Lev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||882704

--- Comment #1 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
This is my first package and I need sponsor.

I am the upstream maintainer.

Build:
Could not figure out how to build with dependency of bug#882704
I used scratch of rawhide and it does not find the dependency it should by
documentation.

fedora-review report is similar to bug#882704, every comment will be fixed in
both packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2012-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Alon Bar-Lev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bazu...@redhat.com,
   ||dougsl...@redhat.com,
   ||ih...@redhat.com,
   ||juan.hernan...@redhat.com,
   ||mgold...@redhat.com,
   ||oschr...@redhat.com
 Blocks||866889 (bootstrap-rewrite)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2012-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Alon Bar-Lev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Barak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|866889 (bootstrap-rewrite)  |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=atF4K7LpOU&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #8 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
Updated artifacts.

spec[1]
srpm[2]
review report[3]

Thanks!

[1] https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy.spec
[2]
https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
[3]
https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy-review.txt

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0DeBheS9w4&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #9 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
[!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
 Note: Could not download Source0

This will be fixed soon.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BPU9ZiabYL&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Douglas Schilling Landgraf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||yzasl...@redhat.com



--- Comment #10 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf  ---
(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #9)
> [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
>  Note: Could not download Source0
> 
> This will be fixed soon.

Correct. 

ovirt-host-deploy.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/stable/3.3/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1.tar.gz
HTTP Error 404: Not Found

As soon you get this fixed, please update the bugzilla.

Also, please check the output of rpmlint:

ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/otopi-plugins/otopi
../../../otopi/plugins/otopi
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/.bundled
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/.bundled
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/otopi ../../../sbin/otopi
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/hooks.d/.keep
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/hooks.d/.keep
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/packages.d/.keep
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/packages.d/.keep
ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/pythonlib/otopi ../../../../li
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ParagNemade/CommonRpmlintErrors#zero-length

Thanks
Douglas

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QpsEvMICXR&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #11 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #10)
> (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #9)
> > [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
> >  Note: Could not download Source0
> > 
> > This will be fixed soon.
> 
> Correct. 
> 
> ovirt-host-deploy.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
> http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/stable/3.3/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1.tar.
> gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> 
> As soon you get this fixed, please update the bugzilla.

Fixed, tarball is now online and URL is corrected.

> 
> Also, please check the output of rpmlint:
> 
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/otopi-plugins/otopi
> ../../../otopi/plugins/otopi
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/.bundled
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: E: zero-length
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/.bundled

These are part of the otopi bundle format.

> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/otopi ../../../sbin/otopi
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/interface-3/pythonlib/otopi ../../../../li
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ParagNemade/CommonRpmlintErrors#zero-length

These point to otopi location, otopi is a dependency for this package.

> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/hooks.d/.
> keep
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: E: zero-length
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/hooks.d/.
> keep
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/packages.d/.
> keep
> ovirt-host-deploy.noarch: E: zero-length
> /usr/share/ovirt-host-deploy/plugins/ovirt-host-deploy/vdsmhooks/packages.d/.
> keep

Part of upstream structure.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vGcVeO6P1i&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #12 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
spec[1]
srpm[2]
review report[3]

Thanks!

[1] https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy.spec
[2]
https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
[3]
https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy-review.txt

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Kx5cyZK4lI&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #13 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf  ---
(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #12)
> spec[1]
> srpm[2]
> review report[3]
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1] https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy.spec
> [2]
> https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1-2.
> fc19.src.rpm
> [3]
> https://github.com/alonbl/fedora-files/blob/master/ovirt-host-deploy-review.
> txt

Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in
  the spec URL.
  Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/fedora/ovirt-host-
  deploy/diff.txt
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL

Source checksums

http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3/src/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
7850b1fed1d50b5b0145a6885199b2a4c606ad66bc624c1486d29cb94368dba7
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
1252a84c19088fa250f2dabdb4b4a54c24f5b99f44b5abd47b87180803a8ca5d
diff -r also reports differences

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=s02zMt41Ox&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #14 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #13)
> Source checksums
> 
> http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3/src/ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1.tar.gz :
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
> 7850b1fed1d50b5b0145a6885199b2a4c606ad66bc624c1486d29cb94368dba7
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> 1252a84c19088fa250f2dabdb4b4a54c24f5b99f44b5abd47b87180803a8ca5d
> diff -r also reports differences

Fixed, I thought we review the spec... no problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qCULJjiL3V&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711



--- Comment #16 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
Thanks!

Waiting for the same reasons as bug#882704.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YtDrRexJnT&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Douglas Schilling Landgraf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #15 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf  ---
Hi Alon,

Your package got approved, you can check the review below.

At this moment, please follow the process from: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

If you have any questions please let me know.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fedora/ovirt-host-
 deploy/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
 pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
 when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_d

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2014-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Alon Bar-Lev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DEFERRED
Last Closed||2014-01-27 09:17:37



--- Comment #17 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
Thank you for your review, it does not seems that ovirt-engine is progressing
into inclusion in fedora so for now there is no reason to include this package
as well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2014-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Bug 882711 depends on bug 882704, which changed state.

Bug 882704 Summary: Review Request: otopi - oVirt Task Oriented Pluggable 
Installer/Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882704

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DEFERRED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Douglas Schilling Landgraf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|rjo...@redhat.com   |dougsl...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OpNbH45Nw8&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-06-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Douglas Schilling Landgraf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf  ---
Hi Alon,

As I jumped to otopi bugzilla, here I am for ovirt-host-deploy.
Can you please update it? It's out of date.

1) Cannot find the spec
wget
https://github.com/downloads/alonbl/ovirt-host-deploy/ovirt-host-deploy.spec
2013-06-11 20:29:07 ERROR 404: Not Found.

2) ovirt-host-deploy is not beta anymore.

Thanks
Douglas

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AbhCm2nzIV&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-06-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

--- Comment #6 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
Hello Douglas,

spec file is at upstream[1].

I will be happy if you can send patches to whatever you think that should be
improved.

Thanks,
Alon

[1]
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-host-deploy.git;a=blob;f=ovirt-host-deploy.spec.in;hb=HEAD

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cA3ZOJNnMc&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

--- Comment #7 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf  ---
Hi Alon,

(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #6)
> Hello Douglas,
> 
> spec file is at upstream[1].
> 
> I will be happy if you can send patches to whatever you think that should be
> improved.
> 

To get sponsored as rpm packager you need to show that you were able to meet
all Fedora requirements to build a rpm. 

Based on that, can you please send an updated SPEC URL and SRPM URL as you did
on comment#1 ?

Thanks
Douglas

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UM39uZG1Xu&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Douglas Schilling Landgraf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W8De7YVNzh&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

--- Comment #2 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
beta is available[1].
we can progress.
what is the next stage?

[1]
http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.2/src/ovirt-host-deploy-1.0.0_beta.tar.gz

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e4pZBsKNU7&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rjo...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?
  Flags||needinfo?(alo...@redhat.com
   ||)

--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones  ---
I'll take the review, but because I'm already sponsoring so many
people I can't be your sponsor.  You'll have to find someone else
to be a sponsor.

The first problem is that both URLs in comment 0 are 404's.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cAH8hQQsj2&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 882711] Review Request: ovirt-host-deploy - oVirt host deploy tool

2013-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882711

Alon Bar-Lev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(alo...@redhat.com |
   |)   |

--- Comment #4 from Alon Bar-Lev  ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'll take the review, but because I'm already sponsoring so many
> people I can't be your sponsor.  You'll have to find someone else
> to be a sponsor.

Thank you, Juan and Ofer are already agreed to be sponsers.

> The first problem is that both URLs in comment 0 are 404's.

This was fixed in beta. I did not wish to repost the report.

Let's do otopi (bug#882704) first as it is dependency of this one.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zYPR5cv5N7&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review