[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-05-11 03:52:14 --- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- This is not the place to discuss about bugs in Netatalk. Please file a bug against the netatalk package to get a new program version and to get bugs fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0M9bwiy1Xja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #9 from HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp --- You should post to netatalk's ML or site. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-admins http://sourceforge.net/p/netatalk/bugs/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y3OqjjH7bFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #6 from HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp --- The netatalk.service file is copied to the /usr/lib/systemd/system. When doing systemctl enable netatalk, symlink will be created in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants. The configuration file is /etc/afp.conf. The sample files are in /usr/share/doc/netatalk-3.0.2/config.example. The /etc/netatalk directory is not used any longer. http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/3.0/htmldocs/upgrade.html#idp5720640 BTW, official rpm is not updated these days. Is Filip Kocina busy? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9v0UkG1IV8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167
--- Comment #7 from Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com ---
I'm working through the conf's and setup.
I can log into the netatalk machine from a remote Leopard Mac. But cannot
transfer files as yet. Patience.
However, I did see a Seg Fault
[bobg@hoho0 ~]$ ad ls
Jan 30 19:19:33.975314 ad[2557] {netatalk_conf.c:1491} (E:Default):
getvolbypath(/home/bobg/.): no volume for path
macdata
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[bobg@hoho0 ~]$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FJciUADb8ya=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #8 from Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com --- Odd - I thought I logged in as 'bobg' [bobg@hoho0 ~]$ macusers PID UID Username Name Logintime Mac 749 0root root 13:05 [bobg@hoho0 ~]$ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wN3mz9G06Fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bob...@rcn.com --- Comment #5 from Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com --- I just built netatalk 3.0.2 from the SRPM. It builds and installs and seems to run (not configured correctly yet by me). The netatalk.service file is not copied to the /etc/systemd/system directory. Also, the /etc/netatalk directory is not created or populated with sample files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ljKGlkzLcwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp --- Comment #2 from HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp --- (In reply to comment #1) Could be that the v3.x breaks some things, don't know. In this case, a new package named netatalk3 could be built, but this must not conflict with the current one. In any case, it must not become an update, rather a completely independent one which is parallel installable besides v2.2. netatalk 2.x and 3.x never live together. When netatalk3 mount netatalk2's volume, it is converted automatically. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5lXg8XkIbAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #3 from HAT h...@fa2.so-net.ne.jp --- (In reply to comment #0) Since this is my first package, I need a sponsor. Any help in that regard would be much appreciated. Hi, I made two SRPMs based on your SRPM. http://www003.upp.so-net.ne.jp/hat/files/netatalk-3.0.1-1.1.fc17.src.rpm http://www003.upp.so-net.ne.jp/hat/files/netatalk-3.0.1-2.1.fc18.src.rpm These differ in spec file. 1) Update Summary, %description and %description devel. AppleTalk is obsoleted. 2) BuildRequires libdb-devel. db4-devel is an old package for compatibility. See Bug 859118. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859118 3) Add netatalk-3.0.1-basedir.patch. In case of Fedora, basedir is /home. 4) Copy afp.conf, not afp.conf.tmpl. afp.conf.tmpl is a source file for generating afp.conf. Don't copy afp.conf.tmpl to /usr/share/doc because it may contain macro in the future. 5) merge netatalk-2.2.3-6 spec file. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/netatalk.git/commit/?h=f18id=39e3953a75aeeda738039845b0e827e805ca0114 6) Scriptlets differ in F17 and F18. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd 7) move afp_signature.conf and afp_voluuid.conf into /var/netatalk/ . http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/3.0/htmldocs/upgrade.html TODO: netatalk 3.0.2 will have new conffile /etc/extmap.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=199urQMcP4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #2) netatalk 2.x and 3.x never live together. When netatalk3 mount netatalk2's volume, it is converted automatically. That's why it doesn't make sense to continue working on this review request. Just file a bug against the existing package if you want to get it updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EcYYtQ9T3ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889167] Review Request: netatalk-3.0.1
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889167 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #0) There is already a package available for netatalk-2.2.x, but version 3.x brought some significant improvements such as new metadata database (i.e. no more .AppleDB directories) and completely new simpler configuration. That's why I've prepared the package for the new version based on the original package, but reflecting the the changes. Netatalk needs to be updated only. This means, you have to file a bug report against that package. Could be that the v3.x breaks some things, don't know. In this case, a new package named netatalk3 could be built, but this must not conflict with the current one. In any case, it must not become an update, rather a completely independent one which is parallel installable besides v2.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aZq2YTTAc6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
