[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(s.bau...@gmx.net) --- Comment #45 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is very old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please either close the bug, or do nothing, in which case automation will close it in one month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Björn 'besser82' Esser 's needinfo: Bug 892335: Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #44 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #41 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- (In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #40) btw. looking at comment 9: mschwendt said he got the build working using `export LANG=us_US.UTF-8` before invoking the compiler-stage. Might be worth a try... Thanks, that helped ;). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #42 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- SPEC: http://sbbaus.fedorapeople.org/AudioCuesheetEditor/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec RPM: http://sbbaus.fedorapeople.org/AudioCuesheetEditor/RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm SRPM: http://sbbaus.fedorapeople.org/AudioCuesheetEditor/SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #38 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- (In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #35) - LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 xbuild --- Builds usually shouldn't use any locale different from C. If you really need some UTF-8 encoding during build, you should use `us_US.UTF-8` instead. I was trying to build it with the locale us-US.UTF-8, but this fails. Also leaving the locale setting out, fails the build. You have any idea, why? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #39 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Can you provide me links to scratch-builds on koji, please? To do such a scratch-build you can use `koji build --scratch --nowait rawhide $srpm`. Then you can paste the links inside here. You will need to have completed the cert-setup using `fedora-packager-setup` before you can use the koji-cli. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #40 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- btw. looking at comment 9: mschwendt said he got the build working using `export LANG=us_US.UTF-8` before invoking the compiler-stage. Might be worth a try... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(s.bau...@gmx.net) | --- Comment #36 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Thanks for the first report. I'll take my time over the weekend to do some stuff. Currently the next release is in testing, so what would you do? Wait for it, or package the current stable release?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #37 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- I'd usually package the lastest stable. If there's a new release then, I'd isn't that hard to upgrade the package again... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #35 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
= Review report for AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1 =
This review report has been made from manually downloaded spec / srpm as
announced in comment #28.
Package has severe issues. :(
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
Issues
==
- specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog:
Tue Jun 16 2013 Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net 1.0.3-1
Tue Jun 09 2013 Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net 1.0.3-1
Sun Apr 04 2013 Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net 0.3.0-1
--- please fix those bogus-dates to existing ones, like either
changing the day matching the date or vice-versa.
- wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding:
/usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor/LICENCE.TXT
/usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor/KNOWN_ISSUES.TXT
/usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor/CHANGELOG.TXT
/usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor/README.TXT
--- please fix this as explained on:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
I'd recommend using this script during %prep, which preserves the
original file's timestamp, too:
for _file in '*.TXT'
do
sed -i.orig -e 's!\r$!!g' ${_file} \
touch -r ${_file}.orig ${_file} \
rm -rf ${_file}.orig
done
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
*No copyright* GPL (v3 or later), Unknown or generated. 5 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/review-
AudioCuesheetEditor/licensecheck.txt
--- License-tag is fine. :)
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/AudioCuesheetEditor
--- dir is created by the package itself, but not owned
as explained below.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/AudioCuesheetEditor
--- remove the '/*' from `/usr/lib/%{name}/*` in %files. This
will make the rpm own `/usr/lib/%{name}` with all it's
contents.
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
--- compiler-flags don't get exported properly. Add
`%configure ||:` at the very beginning of %build.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
--- bogus-dates are present. as explained above.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
--- hardcoding `/usr/lib/` is intentional on Mono / C# based
packages, as explained by the Mono-guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#File_Locations
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
--- debuginfo-pkg is empty, because you strip the exec-perms
from the build binary. make sure the binary keeps it's
exec-perms, please, so rpmbuild's debuginfo automagic will
properly find and extract all debugging symbols from build.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 4 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
--- severe issues are present.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #30 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Thanks for tagging this bug. How do I get sponsored? Still couldn't find someone?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #31 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Sven Baus from comment #30) Thanks for tagging this bug. How do I get sponsored? Still couldn't find someone?! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #32 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- I'll take this. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s.bau...@gmx.net Flags||needinfo?(s.bau...@gmx.net) --- Comment #33 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files error: line 1: Unknown tag: !DOCTYPE html ERROR: Can't parse specfile: can't parse specfile\n (logs in /home/besser82/.cache/fedora-review.log) --- Please upload your recent spec and srpm to some place you can directly link from. To save you some difficulties, I just gave you permissions to access some webspace (~ 2GB) on `fedorapeople.org`. You just need to upload a RSA-key on the FAS [1] and start uploading your files using e.g. scp or filezilla (in SFTP-mode). In order to make your uploads available for public access, you'll need to create a `public_html`-dir inside your home on fp.org and put the files there. When your done with that please provide the links inside a new comment inside this bug. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |AudioCuesheetEditor |AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio ||Cuesheet Editor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor - Audio Cuesheet Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #34 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
My point:
1. From your desktop entry I can see icon is located at:
Icon=/usr/lib/%{name}/resources/icons/application-x-cue-128.png
In common we put icons under /usr/share/pixmaps.
I also think that all data files should be installed to %{_datadir}/%{name} but
not /usr/lib/%{name}
2. Mix using %{buildroot} and ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}, you should only use one of
them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #28 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
SPEC:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/324/tree//trunk/RPM%20Build/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
RPM:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/324/tree//trunk/RPM%20Build/RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
SRPM:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/324/tree//trunk/RPM%20Build/SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
rpmlint output (only errors mentioned):
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:25: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:28: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/resources
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:29: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.exe
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/*
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: no-binary
Binary is included!
This is version 1.0.3. I really would thank anyone for getting this inside
fedora ;).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x3p3JDpMK2a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- You still need to find a sponsor first, this can help get this software into Fedora quickly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TL2sZlQ0nta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #27 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
SPEC:
https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/255/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
RPM:
https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/255/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.3.0-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
SRPM:
https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/255/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
rpmlint output (only errors mentioned):
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:25: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:28: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/resources
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:29: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.exe
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/*
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: no-binary
Binary is included!
AudioCuesheetEditor.src:25: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.src:28: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/resources
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.src:29: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.exe
Needed by mono guidelines
AudioCuesheetEditor.src:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/*
Needed by mono guidelines
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 12 warnings.
This is version 0.3.0. I really would thank anyone for getting this inside
fedora ;).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OSOrNPfQZ1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |AudioCuesheetEditor |AudioCuesheetEditor |(v0.2.1)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GxGKI0q1gZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #26 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Version 0.3.0 is almost done, seems like developing works faster than packaging for fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hZzErDQDQHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #25 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Hello? I would like to package this package for fedora?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w6cueCn3tSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #24 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- No one alive? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x0svnTu51ua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #23 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Hello? Any Help would be good?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nZxLZPzT0Fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #22 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
SPEC:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/179/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
RPM:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/179/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
SRPM:
http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/179/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
rpmlint output (only new errors mentioned) :
[makerpm@Sven SPECS]$ rpmlint AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
../RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
../SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:25: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}
Needs to be done, because mono should not be packaged to _libdir.
How do we now go on?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kvgUpiUDeWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #21 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
Ok, I have been able to do some more optimization as you offered. Thank you.
Only 2 more thing are open:
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*
* Are you aware of the Mono Packaging Guidelines?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono
What exactly do you mean? AudioCuesheetEditor binaries and stuff will be
stored under %{_libdir}/%{name}/*, so why not use wildcards? Or what is the
major problem here?
Anyone any idea, what is meant here? I would like to get this package started
;).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bfLba7a24za=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #20 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Ok, I have been able to do some more optimization as you offered. Thank you.
Only 2 more thing are open:
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*
* Are you aware of the Mono Packaging Guidelines?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono
What exactly do you mean? AudioCuesheetEditor binaries and stuff will be stored
under %{_libdir}/%{name}/*, so why not use wildcards? Or what is the major
problem here?
There is also this warning:
AudioCuesheetEditor.src: W: strange-permission AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
0777L
$ rpmls -p AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- AudioCuesheetEditor-src-v0.2.1.tar.gz
-rwxrwxrwx AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
Sorry, that was because of my build. I build under a different user, will be
removed, if the package can go on ;).
Thanks for helping me.
Greetings
Sven
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1ZxlWS6alTa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #18 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- SPEC: http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/161/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec RPM: http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/162/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm SRPM: http://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/161/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm rpmlint output (only errors included): [makerpm@Sven SPECS]$ rpmlint AudioCuesheetEditor.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: no-binary There are binaries called AudioCuesheetEditor.exe that need to be run with mono. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings. So, now the only error is not an error. I have done some testing on the package and on the vm everything works perfect. How do we now go on? Greetings Sven -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ttpko2nqAta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Okay, a src.rpm that can be built. Let's try to squash some of the issues:
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*
* Are you aware of the Mono Packaging Guidelines?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono
BuildRequires: gtk-sharp2,mono-core,gtk-sharp2-devel,mono-devel
A bit too many here. Typically, the -devel packages depend on their base
packages already:
gtk2-sharp2-devel - gtk2-sharp
mono-devel - mono-core
Requires: gtk-sharp2,mono-core
This is still an issue (bug 880763 comment 7). There are several automatic
dependencies for Mono. Check out:
rpm -qR AudioCuesheetEditor|grep ^mono
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
* rpmlint. You don't need to run it for the spec file when you run it for the
src.rpm, which contains the spec file.
There is also this warning:
AudioCuesheetEditor.src: W: strange-permission AudioCuesheetEditor.spec 0777L
$ rpmls -p AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- AudioCuesheetEditor-src-v0.2.1.tar.gz
-rwxrwxrwx AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
%description
You've changed it to a much shorter one compared with 0.2.0, why not mention
that it features a graphical user-interface (GUI)? When users search for a
graphical cuesheet editor, that could be helpful.
%install
cp -R %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/bin/Release/resources
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/resources
%build
chmod a-x %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/*.TXT
chmod a-x %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/bin/Release/resources/*.xml
At the beginning of each section, such as %build or %install, you are inside
the right build directory. The directory you've %setup in %prep. So, explicitly
referring to paths in %_builddir is not necessary in the whole spec file:
chmod a-x *.TXT bin/Release/resources/*.xml
Further, many more files inside the RPM package executable. For example, the
icons and the EXE (the .exe doesn't need to be executable, does it?).
Basically, you could chmod -x many more files at the end of %prep already.
echo '[Desktop Entry]' %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
echo 'Type=Application'
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
echo 'Exec=AudioCuesheetEditor'
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
...
Much more readable and much less effort to type it or change it:
cat %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop EOF
[Desktop Entry]
Type=Application
Exec=AudioCuesheetEditor
...
EOF
desktop-file-install --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
Two guidelines are relevant here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N1jZSLWjbda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #15 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- SPEC: https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/157/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec rpmlint output: [makerpm@Sven SPECS]$ rpmlint AudioCuesheetEditor.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cuesheet - cue sheet, cue-sheet, dustsheet No spelling error! AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cuesheets - cue sheets, cue-sheets, dustsheets No spelling error! AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: no-binary There are binaries called AudioCuesheetEditor.exe that need to be run with mono. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib As mentioned above there are binaries. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE.TXT AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE.TXT I could find no encoding error. The files are UTF8 encoded. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/CHANGELOG.TXT AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/CHANGELOG.TXT I could find no encoding error. The files are UTF8 encoded. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/README.TXT What about that error? I removed the executable bit inside the build stage. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/README.TXT I could find no encoding error. The files are UTF8 encoded. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE_DE.TXT What about that error? I removed the executable bit inside the build stage. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE_DE.TXT I could find no encoding error. The files are UTF8 encoded. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/KNOWN_ISSUES.TXT What about that error? I removed the executable bit inside the build stage. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE_EN.TXT What about that error? I removed the executable bit inside the build stage. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE_EN.TXT I could find no encoding error. The files are UTF8 encoded. AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary AudioCuesheetEditor Suplied inside README.TXT AudioCuesheetEditor.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cuesheet - cue sheet, cue-sheet, dustsheet No spelling error! AudioCuesheetEditor.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cuesheets - cue sheets, cue-sheets, dustsheets No spelling error! 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 12 warnings. Could you please help me with the errors? I have no idea what I should do to set the correct permission?! Thanks and greetings Sven -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dypabpjUzEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #16 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- SPEC: https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/158/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec Sorry updated spec wasn't uploaded yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YlRJ6eUfZ5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- Please be so smart to ignore obvious false positives in those spelling-errors rpmlints. Those are quite normal for many packages, where the spell-checker doesn't recognize technical terms or suggests hyphenated compounds (cue-sheet) instead of closed compounds (cuesheet). It makes no sense to clutter up the review ticket with repeatedly referring to the same rpmlint warning. They are just Warnings not errors. [...] About the other warnings and errors, prefer rpmlint -i … because it will print more verbose/helpful explanations. I may comment on some of them but would need a buildable src.rpm first. [...] AudioCuesheetEditor.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share /doc/AudioCuesheetEditor-0.2.1/LICENCE_EN.TXT What about that error? I removed the executable bit inside the build stage. Verify it by listing the package contents. Use rpm or rpmls. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5SGBX9hTdLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #14 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- I will rework the spec since I have seen, that I have missed several things: - install of desktop file - install of start script I'm currently working on it, but haven't finished everything yet. You will get a new version in time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZBq2SFE1f8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- I see that consulting Fedora's mono list has been fruitful, too. Good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=njpPimT8Yaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #11 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
Desktop File:
https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/154/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/AudioCuesheetEditor.desktop
SPEC:
https://sourceforge.net/p/audiocuesheet/code/154/tree/trunk/RPM%20Build/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
Hello Everybody,
I've reworked some stuff and have been able to build an rpm. I have done first
tests with rpmlint to it, which gave me the following output:
[makerpm@Sven SPECS]$ rpmlint AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
AudioCuesheetEditor.spec:20: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %setup -q -c
%{buildroot}/%{name}-%{version}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
The Warning concerns the setup stage. I have no idea how to do it other way, so
I would ignore this warning.
Would you guys please take a first look above the spec and tell me if there are
bad errors inside?
Thank you for your help.
Greetings
Sven
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PmnNWszDi4a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
First, have a look at the packaging guidelines to get a proper download URL for
SourceForge stuff:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %setup -q -c %{buildroot}/%{name}-%{version}
It should be unneded to define such a folder for extracting the sources. The -c
switch is for creating a build folder if the tarball doesn't contain it. Try
%setup -q with the tarball from the mentioned download URL, should work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cCSI4LLdQWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- I had pointed out the wrong %setup usage in bug 880763 comment 7 already. Reading such comments and answering/acknowledging can lead to better communication with reviewers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F6JzDW90yJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- I've been away for a week and need to catch up with accumulated mail. The provided spec file has not been tested by you at all. :( It fails for simple commands, such as rpmbuild -bs and -bb, because the download link for the source tarball results in a wrong file name. For a last try, I've given spectool -g AudioCueSheet.spec a try, and it redownloaded the tarball as a file with name download because of the Source0 URL you use. That may be a temporary work-around, but needs fixing. Finally, the built src.rpm failed early with Fedora 18 for rpmbuild -bb: line 29: xbuild: command not found A build requirement is missing. I've stopped there. The spec file also still suffers from issues I've pointed out in the old ticket. You won't manage to maintain an RPM package if you don't care about packaging topics. Please provide a src.rpm that builds for you with either plain rpmbuild, Mock or in the official Fedora Build System: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Install_the_client_tools_.28Koji.29_and_set_up_your_certificate https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Upload_Your_Package If your released upstream source tarball doesn't build at all, this is beyond the scope of a Fedora Package Review Request. I see you've asked about xbuild in another place already, note that there's also a Fedora mono list, perhaps with subscribers who can help: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mono -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gpSNaDdZala=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #8 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Thank you Michael for your explanating answer. As you have already seen, the spec isn't finished yet, since I'm stuck in the build stage. When I can get the xbuild run, I can fix everything else, since I'm currently trying a first build of the rpm. Thank you for informing me about the mailing list, I will ask there for help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qksJQdwXTha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com --- BuildRequires: mono-devel for /usr/bin/xbuild gtk-gui/MainWindow.cs(152,51): error CS1012: Too many characters in character literal %build export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 xbuild … makes the build work. When using rpmbuild, it sets 'export LANG=C' for the build environment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xFwTzgbGnQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #6 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- No one any idea? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8DLbipdyP0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #5 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- Hello, I could need some help over here. Anyone has any idea, why it fails with xbuild? Greetings Sven -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I8nPmP1zZSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trp...@katamail.com --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com --- Why don't you continue with #880763 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1lcDIfBwi3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 --- Comment #2 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- #880763 was for version 0.2.0, this is now for version 0.2.1. Or should I have reused the bug?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Tx2BVitvyha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #2) #880763 was for version 0.2.0, this is now for version 0.2.1. Or should I have reused the bug?! For a review request, the version number doesn't matter. Please choose the bug report on which you want to continue and mark the other one as a duplicate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kzA33T6XMqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 892335] Review Request: AudioCuesheetEditor (v0.2.1)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335 Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #4 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net --- *** Bug 880763 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0zaQ6YuHMha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
