[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2015-01-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #18 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-geojson
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2015-01-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2015-01-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432



--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-27 17:52:22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g71B4wFfSta=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vj9chTeJADa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sKJpapz4Tba=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3SedNezmf9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #13 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Please push the updates to stable!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7n3oODRTBHa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jthHGWAwVka=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-geojson
Short Description: Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features
Owners: ralph
Branches: f19 f18 f17 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SSvaYctZP1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tu6L9XvM44a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gsSVGoq2MHa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mg2xPhT77pa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eh5DenhaJKa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zON3q8Zxv1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wgYPlaUXJLa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-geojson-1.0.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-geojson-1.0.1-2.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C0TpRIQuWWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QQ1D5rkGxra=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #6 from Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.


[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D1WYT3qnN9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|yohangratero...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gouWhIpNnYa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Stuff like this:
File objects.txt, line 60, in objects.txt
Failed example:
feature_dict # doctest: +ELLIPSIS

Expected:
{u'geometry': {u'type': u'Point', u'coordinates': [4..., -54...]}, u'type':
u'Feature', u'properties': {}, u'id': None}
Got:
{'geometry': {'type': 'Point', 'coordinates': [4.53242, -54.1231]}, 'type':
'Feature', 'properties': {}, 'id': None}

The testing framework seems to be failing, but not the code under test.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=02fo0XgCVFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||yohangratero...@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com ---
Hello Ralph, 

What's the error that showed in test?

Really your package pass successfully fedora-review , but I want know about the
test!

Regards!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VjjXLfbJ5Ga=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Hi, I removed the example and patched out the setuptools requirement.  I
couldn't find anywhere it was actually used at runtime (sometimes it is
required for entry-points iteration at runtime).

I couldn't get the tests to pass.  It has to do with their use of doctests'
ELLIPSIS.. with which I'm unfamiliar.  I gave it a good try, though.

Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-geojson.spec
SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-geojson-1.0.1-2.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EL4ejsylOTa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||volke...@gmx.at

--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
I'd suggest to remove everything from Here's an example on from the
description.

I notice that the setuptools are listed under install_requires in setup.py. To
my knowledge, install_requires is supposed to list runtime requirements. Does
it really need the setuptools at runtime?

Can something be done to run the tests successfully?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4OEkviwtBya=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-02-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

--- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
This package built on koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5063079

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5PVRJaumsda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features

2013-02-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||916433

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VMRmCFSNERa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review