[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flags||fedora-review- Last Closed||2015-08-11 21:58:40 --- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com --- @Pete: according the process, I must close this review as stalled, and I need you to create a new one. Feel free to assign it directly to me :) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vimar...@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(d.bu...@saiweb.co | |.uk)| --- Comment #7 from Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com --- Removing needinfo flag considering its an old request and there is a new .spec and build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) CC||stew...@flamingspork.com --- Comment #6 from Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1025581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmack...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com --- Refreshing this review request for PXBU 2.2.9: https://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/2.2.9/percona-xtrabackup.spec https://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/2.2.9/percona-xtrabackup-2.2.9-1.fc21.src.rpm Successful builds at: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/pmackinn/percona-xtrabackup/build/100832/ Selected 2.2.9 for compatibility with mariadb [5.5,10] based on: https://www.percona.com/forums/questions-discussions/percona-xtrabackup/34901-error-on-flush-no_write_to_binlog-changed_page_bitmaps-after-update-to-2-2-10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmcal...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com --- Not sure if this is the same tool as a bug 1025581, but 2.1.6 was released (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852224) and fixes a possible security issue: A fixed initialization vector (constant string) was used while encrypting the data. This opened the encrypted stream/data to plaintext attacks among others. Bug fixed #1185343. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 Roel Van de Paar roel.vandep...@percona.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roel.vandep...@percona.com --- Comment #2 from Roel Van de Paar roel.vandep...@percona.com --- Hey David, any updates? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W3P3H894MYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 --- Comment #3 from David Busby d.bu...@saiweb.co.uk --- Hey Roel, Latest is: http://oneiroi.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/percona-xtrabackup.spec.epel Presently there is some debate w.r.t. patching of mysql sources needed for this package; there are two avenues at this time and I am awaiting on decision on these. 1) I suggested patches are applied as part of the RPM build; this is perfectly valid imo. 2) There is a possibility that there will be pre-patched sources made available for the purposes of build. Once a consensus is reached on how to proceed, I can update the spec file accordingly and the submission process can continue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5pNxmFbK8Ba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431 David Busby d.bu...@saiweb.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(d.bu...@saiweb.co ||.uk) --- Comment #1 from David Busby d.bu...@saiweb.co.uk --- Please note a rework of the spec file is currently in progress here: http://oneiroi.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/percona-xtrabackup.spec.epel to conform with packaging guidelines, this will replace the original spec file once complete I will update this request again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RbAVZvQXEVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review