[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2015-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2015-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
  Flags||fedora-review-
Last Closed||2015-08-11 21:58:40



--- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
@Pete: according the process, I must close this review as stalled, and I need
you to create a new one. Feel free to assign it directly to me :)


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2015-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vimar...@redhat.com
  Flags|needinfo?(d.bu...@saiweb.co |
   |.uk)|



--- Comment #7 from Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com ---
Removing needinfo flag considering its an old request and there is a new .spec
and build.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2015-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
 CC||stew...@flamingspork.com



--- Comment #6 from Victoria Martinez de la Cruz vimar...@redhat.com ---
*** Bug 1025581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2015-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pmack...@redhat.com



--- Comment #5 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
Refreshing this review request for PXBU 2.2.9:

https://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/2.2.9/percona-xtrabackup.spec
https://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/2.2.9/percona-xtrabackup-2.2.9-1.fc21.src.rpm

Successful builds at:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/pmackinn/percona-xtrabackup/build/100832/

Selected 2.2.9 for compatibility with mariadb [5.5,10] based on:
https://www.percona.com/forums/questions-discussions/percona-xtrabackup/34901-error-on-flush-no_write_to_binlog-changed_page_bitmaps-after-update-to-2-2-10

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mmcal...@redhat.com



--- Comment #4 from Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com ---
Not sure if this is the same tool as a bug 1025581, but 2.1.6 was released
(https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852224) and fixes a possible
security issue:


A fixed initialization vector (constant string) was used while encrypting
the data. This opened the encrypted stream/data to plaintext attacks among
others. Bug fixed #1185343.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2013-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

Roel Van de Paar roel.vandep...@percona.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||roel.vandep...@percona.com

--- Comment #2 from Roel Van de Paar roel.vandep...@percona.com ---
Hey David, any updates? Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=W3P3H894MYa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2013-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

--- Comment #3 from David Busby d.bu...@saiweb.co.uk ---
Hey Roel,

Latest is:
http://oneiroi.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/percona-xtrabackup.spec.epel

Presently there is some debate w.r.t. patching of mysql sources needed for this
package; there are two avenues at this time and I am awaiting on decision on
these.

1) I suggested patches are applied as part of the RPM build; this is perfectly
valid imo.

2) There is a possibility that there will be pre-patched sources made available
for the purposes of build.

Once a consensus is reached on how to proceed, I can update the spec file
accordingly and the submission process can continue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5pNxmFbK8Ba=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918431] Review Request: percona-xtrabackup - online (non-blockable) backup solution for InnoDB and XtraDB engines

2013-04-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918431

David Busby d.bu...@saiweb.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(d.bu...@saiweb.co
   ||.uk)

--- Comment #1 from David Busby d.bu...@saiweb.co.uk ---
Please note a rework of the spec file is currently in progress here:
http://oneiroi.fedorapeople.org/percona/xtrabackup/percona-xtrabackup.spec.epel
to conform with packaging guidelines, this will replace the original spec file
once complete I will update this request again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RbAVZvQXEVa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review