[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Matthew Farrellee changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||985087 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 [Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Björn Esser --- I'll take this with bz 823122 zookeeper in a row. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D8xbZcm4Wf&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc18.src.rpm -removed jpackage-utils reference from javadoc subpackage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BAeAo2hukD&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #3 from Björn Esser --- Created attachment 759693 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=759693&action=edit FTBFS - BuildLog FTBFS on RAWHIDE Please fix, see attachment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qOCeuZ7jI7&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- sorry, for the wait, can you retry now? Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cejqMgmVuZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #759693|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Björn Esser --- Created attachment 759719 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=759719&action=edit FTBFS - 2 - BuildLog Still FTBFS, but new reason, see attachment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bS5sJjz4wC&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- hi. thanks for your time spent for review my packages. is a boost library problem, now try to rebuild bookkeeper in rawhide before post a new package... with a little build fix for the c libraries sorry for the wait regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cAcnOzZi4u&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #7 from Björn Esser --- Hey Gil! You're welcome. Didn't we all became packagers, bcause we want to improve Fedora? So am I. Robert Rati asked on devel-ml for someone reviewing bugs blocking hadoop and just said "Let's-a-go" :) If just have some more pkgs urgently waiting for review, just ask me. I don't promise anything, but will do my best to help out asap. Since we're both in same TZ (CEST/CET) i assume, let's take this for tommorow. Today I took and approved six out of seven reviews blocking hadoop and now I'm tired a bit... Cheers, Björn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5NUIWKaahM&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #759719|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Björn Esser --- Created attachment 760120 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=760120&action=edit fix build with boost >= 1.53.0 This should fix build. Changed things are backport-compatible with previous boost-versions >= 1.40.0 Please update and I'll take a new review run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8k5L8rlQ2Z&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc18.src.rpm - applied boost patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MCtXDOPOYK&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo --- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5496273 reporte only these warnings: channel.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Hedwig::AsioDuplexChannel::doConnect(const OperationCallbackPtr&)': channel.cpp:536:29: warning: variable 'error' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] boost::system::error_code error = boost::asio::error::host_not_found; ^ channel.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Hedwig::AsioSSLDuplexChannel::doConnect(const OperationCallbackPtr&)': channel.cpp:663:29: warning: variable 'error' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] boost::system::error_code error = boost::asio::error::host_not_found; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4MRGYy3KAy&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #11 from Björn Esser --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10) > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5496273 > > reporte only these warnings: > channel.cpp: In member function 'virtual void > Hedwig::AsioDuplexChannel::doConnect(const OperationCallbackPtr&)': > channel.cpp:536:29: warning: variable 'error' set but not used > [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >boost::system::error_code error = boost::asio::error::host_not_found; > ^ > channel.cpp: In member function 'virtual void > Hedwig::AsioSSLDuplexChannel::doConnect(const OperationCallbackPtr&)': > channel.cpp:663:29: warning: variable 'error' set but not used > [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >boost::system::error_code error = boost::asio::error::host_not_found; You can safely ignore these. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JVSip2AanE&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589
--- Comment #12 from Björn Esser ---
Package has some minor issues, no real blockers, so fixing in SCM will be OK.
#
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Maven packages should use new style packaging
Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Apache_Maven
---> comment about this in spec and update after F18 EOL
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: make
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
---> remove from BR, please
- Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: Missing: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in libhedwig,
libhedwig-devel, bookkeeper-java
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage
---> false positve: main-pkg is app for running on server.
rest is either docs or libs providing API for client-software.
- libhedwig.x86_64: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libhedwig01.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libboost_system-mt.so.1.53.0
---> get rid of unused-shlib-dep, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency
AFTER invoking autoreconf invoke:
`sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool`
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libhedwig ,
libhedwig-devel , bookkeeper-java , bookkeeper-javadoc
---> see above
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)".
3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bjoern.esser/fedora/review/948589-bookkeeper/licensecheck.txt
---> License-tag is fine.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 102400 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build th
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Björn Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Björn Esser --- Just forgot to set fedora-review(+)... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OC9uFLdGIX&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc18.src.rpm - removed make form BR - removed unused-shlib-dep, thanks to Björn Esser New Package SCM Request === Package Name: bookkeeper Short Description: Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper Owners: gil Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ojfLVL506c&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8DIJhUcH9m&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cfDaU1npsF&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VhMa05i7gZ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- hsqldb1-1.8.1.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hsqldb1-1.8.1.3-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ozSXra9ESa&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #17 from Björn Esser --- (In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #16) > hsqldb1-1.8.1.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hsqldb1-1.8.1.3-1.fc19 This is Bug 948589 - Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper! You possibly mixed up bug#? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fKCwEOYVhm&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #18 from gil cattaneo --- sorry! yes, fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZGvPhXPxuv&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XpPnVRoFRY&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sIQTWmlh4p&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589
--- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %files -n libhedwig-devel
> %dir %{_includedir}/hedwig-*/hedwig
> %{_includedir}/hedwig-*/hedwig/*.h
Directory %{_includedir}/hedwig-* is not included.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
You might want to give this %files section a second though and either make it
more explicit (= less wildcards + spell out specific header names to expect a
specific API) or simply include the full tree starting at the top directory
with a single entry:
%files -n libhedwig-devel
%{_includedir}/hedwig-*/
Then all directories are included properly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Sg6rEkuhN2&a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- bookkeeper-4.2.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bookkeeper-4.2.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dMJZhXKTnE&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||bookkeeper-4.2.1-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-29 14:19:21 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- bookkeeper-4.2.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EpCMfbEmFh&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bookkeeper-4.2.1-2.fc19 |bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc19 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- bookkeeper-4.2.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K4GT3eurYA&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Bug 948589 depends on bug 823122, which changed state. Bug 823122 Summary: Review Request: zookeeper - A high-performance coordination service for distributed applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823122 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ACI2fjD81w&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KoGCOa3zGJ&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||823122 Summary|Review Request: bookKeeper |Review Request: bookkeeper |- Apache BookKeeper |- Apache BookKeeper |sub-project of ZooKeeper|sub-project of ZooKeeper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dgvSvvC4Cj&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Brusab2jMT&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 948589] Review Request: bookkeeper - Apache BookKeeper sub-project of ZooKeeper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948589 Timothy St. Clair changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tstcl...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dFVN2RVXKa&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
