[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-11-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||tipcutils-2.0.5-4.el6



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eFCvbUtl19a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-05-05 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-05-06 00:23:51

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ixriuf9q9Fa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-05-05 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YstD3GjOIFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6prfLXvgHPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xqlYK2NZkBa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UAwSjZAnqOa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fXBdTJD6FWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JFR4VfrjS5a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tipcutils-2.0.5-4.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RFKSZmzCFGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RQQxinWmbfa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZGNi5WyKY1a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #11 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu ---
T.C: Thanks for approving this, I'll be mindful of that moving forward.



--


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tipcutils
Short Description: Utils package required to configure TIPC
Owners: lsm5
Branches: f18 f19 el6
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V4T9mZXYmca=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Albert Strasheim full...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||full...@gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from Albert Strasheim full...@gmail.com ---
As a matter of interest, is the Fedora kernel getting CONFIG_TIPC at some
point?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dZfkNZonjPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #8 from Erik Hugne erik.hu...@ericsson.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 As a matter of interest, is the Fedora kernel getting CONFIG_TIPC at some
 point?
It was actually included in earlier versions of Fedora.
But back then, there was a parallell development track on Sourceforge going on
that left the in-kernel code basically unmaintained.
This understandably led to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574800

Since then, the Sourceforge track have been dropped and merged to the kernel.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Lsc7qoc6Tla=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #9 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu ---
Sorry for the (possible) double post, I tried commenting via email, but doesn't
seem to have worked. Anyway:

SRPM url:
http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tipcutils-2.0.5-4.fc20.src.rpm


%changelog
* Mon Apr 22 2013 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu - 2.0.5-4
- LICENSE file generated

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CrHyBLFRrda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #10 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
In the future, please don't forget to provide and update the standalone spec
file URL.  It makes it easier to check that simple little things like this have
been fixed.

This package is APPROVED.

Please file a bug against the kernel if this package needs configuration
options in the kernel turned on to be functional.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uR0vDOnAaFa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(l...@buffalo.edu) |

--- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu ---
Spec URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/tipcutils.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tipcutils-2.0.5-2.fc20.src.rpm

$ rpmlint SPECS/tipcutils.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint SRPMS/tipcutils-2.0.5-2.fc20.src.rpm 
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Utils - Tills
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace - user space,
user-space, users pace
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tipc - tip, tic, tips
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config - con fig,
con-fig, configure
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg - eh, e, g
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reconfiguring - re
configuring, re-configuring, recon figuring
tipcutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US netcat - net cat,
net-cat, Netscape
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/tipcutils-2.0.5-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Utils - Tills
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace - user
space, user-space, users pace
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tipc - tip, tic,
tips
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config - con fig,
con-fig, configure
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg - eh, e, g
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reconfiguring - re
configuring, re-configuring, recon figuring
tipcutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US netcat - net cat,
net-cat, Netscape
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.


Upstream said, License is prepended to each file, so they won't be including a
separate LICENSE file.

Default is to not install any scripts, installed only if explicitly mentioned
using: ./configure --enable-scripts

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ikFqTktRKNa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #5 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu ---
PREFIX not needed in spec file, removed.

SRPM URL:
http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tipcutils-2.0.5-3.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=axqwewzCjta=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #6 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 Upstream said, License is prepended to each file, so they won't be including
 a separate LICENSE file.

Unfortunately, upstream's unwillingness to add a LICENSE file does not absolve
us from the BSD's requirement to provide a copy of the license along with
binary copies of the software.  Please include a copy of the LICENSE somehow.

You could do something like this in %prep to avoid having to create your own
LICENSE file:
head -n31 tipc-config/tipc-config.c | tail -n28 | sed 's/ \* //g'  LICENSE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WCpZ7JW36aa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #1 from Erik Hugne erik.hu...@ericsson.com ---
*** Bug 854256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=izVIwHpIcla=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Bug 953379 depends on bug 854256, which changed state.

Bug 854256 Summary: Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to 
configure TIPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gJE7vLah8xa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org ---
Potential reviewers of this package, please find latest updates toward the end
of Comment 1. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NZn3B2BKJVa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nubvRhiotra=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tchollingswo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tchollingswo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8TvtJ75nX3a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=o6Q05XRXHha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---

Package Review
==

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

= Issues =

[!]: License is listed as BSD, but no copy of the license is included.

 The BSD license states: 

Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the 
 documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

 In order to comply with this clause of the license, a copy of the license
 text MUST be included in %doc.  You can either work with upstream to
include
 one, or include one yourself.

 For more information on handling this situation, see:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

[!]: The $PREFIX is hardcoded.

 You shouldn't need this at all, as it's handled by the %configure macro.
 If you do need it, please use PREFIX=%{_prefix} instead.

[!]: The upstream tarball includes an initscript, but this package does not
ship
 a systemd service.

 Is the functionality provided by the initscript necessary or desired?

[!]: The provided spec file and the spec in the SRPM differ.

 Please make sure they are identical next time.

= Things to Consider 

[ ]: The %files section contains an unnecessary %defattr line.

 This package does not contain the remaning necessary boilerplate to be
 supported on RHEL 5, and this line is no longer necessary in modern
Fedora.
 Please consider removing it.

[ ]: The summary and description could use some more work.

 Please consider briefly explaining what TIPC is.

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
 Note: %defattr present but not needed
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 BSD (3 clause). 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in
 /home/fedora/patches/FedoraReview/953379-tipcutils/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
 Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[!]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or 

[Bug 953379] Review Request: tipcutils - Utils package required to configure TIPC

2013-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379

T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(l...@buffalo.edu)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9ehfh9mMkwa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review