[Bug 954148] Review Request: mingw-enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148

Marcel Wysocki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(m...@satgnu.net)  |needinfo-



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 954148] Review Request: mingw-enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148

Itamar Reis Peixoto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br,
   ||m...@satgnu.net
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
  Flags||needinfo?(m...@satgnu.net)
Last Closed||2016-03-19 21:37:59



--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto  ---
please reopen if you're still interested, thank you.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 954148] Review Request: mingw-enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148



--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák  ---
This review looks like stalled and can be closed within week according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews .

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 954148] Review Request: mingw-enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 954148] Review Request: mingw-enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148

František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz



--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
Created attachment 809759
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=809759action=edit
linker flags to produce shared library

MinGW ports need always -no-undefined flag when linking a library. The hacks in
the specfile can be replaced by this patch (with added dependency on automake).

The --output-def in the patch is not needed, it's just the producing .def and
packaging it could be useful.

Incorporating this to upstream would require some more work on autostuff - to
enable flags in configure only for MinGW builds.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review