[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||c2esp-2.6-1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2013-06-04 23:22:13

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7HZ1oBXpWaa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com ---
No blocker identified, package is accepted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5KhYu6Xflua=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: c2esp
Short Description: CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
Owners: jpopelka
Branches: f19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AcFSZqtmqna=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fpoko...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=23Vgoei6Oea=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |
  Flags||fedora-cvs+

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=38Vi0sUpD8a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0DgLDVVYkAa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WiTJn9onCRa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/c2esp-2.6-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iIoa11cgQAa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FrYKHCUl08a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fpoko...@redhat.com

--- Comment #3 from Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 5 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 961446-c2esp/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: Uses parallel make.
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, 

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

--- Comment #4 from Fridolín Pokorný fpoko...@redhat.com ---
Manual review was done, all manual review passes should be marked as [x]
(passed). Sorry for that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F55mwSQyu0a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||awill...@redhat.com
 Blocks|834088  |
   |(BetaFreezeException,F19Bet |
   |a-accepted,F19BetaFreezeExc |
   |ept)|
 Whiteboard||RejectedFreezeException

--- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
Discussed at 2013-05-20 freeze exception review meeting:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-05-20/f19beta-blocker-review-7.2013-05-20-16.07.log.txt
. Rejected as a freeze exception issue: in the first place it doesn't appear
likely this is going to be reviewed and accepted in time for inclusion, in the
second place this can be fixed well enough with an update, there's no need to
break freeze just to improve printing support.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6oDYoPxK3ja=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-16 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Account for Fedora Blocker Bugs Application blockerb...@fedoraproject.org 
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||834088
   ||(BetaFreezeException,F19Bet
   ||a-accepted,F19BetaFreezeExc
   ||ept)

--- Comment #1 from Account for Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 
blockerb...@fedoraproject.org ---
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 19-beta by Fedora user quickbooks using the
blocker tracking app because:

 cannot print

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YvT4BtUKtsa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 961446] Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961446

Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||959703

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XSjiQRiYapa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review